The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Abstract
Objective: To develop a simple and straightforward functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS) for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia to determine the severity of the disorder and the effectiveness of therapy or outcome. Design: Five years ago, the author developed a dysphagia staging scale based on personal experience and a review of the English literature. This scale was shared with colleagues from the specialties of otolaryngology, speech pathology, neurology, and gastroenterology, both within and outside the author’s institution. Minor modifications have been made. The scale has been used in clinical management and retrospective studies. Setting: Patients were seen in a multispecialty, tertiary care, academic center. Patients: The patient population included the full spectrum of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults, but was weighted heavily toward aging patients and patients with head and neck cancer, neurologic disorders, gastroesophageal conditions, and psychiatric problems. Results: The stages are as follows: stage 0 = normal function and asymptomatic; stage I = normal function but with episodic or daily symptoms of dysphagia; stage II = compensated abnormal function manifested by significant dietary modifications or prolonged mealtime (without weight loss or aspiration); stage III = decompensated abnormal function with weight loss of 10% or less of body weight over 6 months due to dysphagia, or daily cough, gagging, or aspiration during meals; stage IV = severely decompensated abnormal function with weight loss of more than 10% of body weight over 6 months due to dysphagia, or severe aspiration with bronchopulmonary complications, nonoral feeding recommended for most of nutrition, and stage V = nonoral feeding for all nutrition. Conclusions: The FOSS was successful for staging various adult patients with dysphagia into clinically useful, overall performance categories. It has been applied successfully to retrospective outcome studies and to clinical management by clinicians from different specialties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A penetration-aspiration scale
Rosenbek, J. C., Robbins, J. A., Roecker, E. B., Coyle, J. L., & Wood, J. L. (1996) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/bf00417897 · Cited by 2,803
Cited by
Reliability and Validity of a Tool to Measure the Severity of Dysphagia: The Food Intake LEVEL Scale
Kunieda, K., Ohno, T., Fujishima, I., Hojo, K., & Morita, T. (2013) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.020 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Salassa, J.
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 230-234
- ISSN
- 0257-2753 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9875
- OpenAlex
- W2055859269
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000016941
- The paper
- Salassa, J. (1999). A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. Digestive Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.