Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Salassa, John·1999·Digestive Diseases

Abstract

Objective: To develop a simple and straightforward functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS) for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia to determine the severity of the disorder and the effectiveness of therapy or outcome. Design: Five years ago, the author developed a dysphagia staging scale based on personal experience and a review of the English literature. This scale was shared with colleagues from the specialties of otolaryngology, speech pathology, neurology, and gastroenterology, both within and outside the author’s institution. Minor modifications have been made. The scale has been used in clinical management and retrospective studies. Setting: Patients were seen in a multispecialty, tertiary care, academic center. Patients: The patient population included the full spectrum of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults, but was weighted heavily toward aging patients and patients with head and neck cancer, neurologic disorders, gastroesophageal conditions, and psychiatric problems. Results: The stages are as follows: stage 0 = normal function and asymptomatic; stage I = normal function but with episodic or daily symptoms of dysphagia; stage II = compensated abnormal function manifested by significant dietary modifications or prolonged mealtime (without weight loss or aspiration); stage III = decompensated abnormal function with weight loss of 10% or less of body weight over 6 months due to dysphagia, or daily cough, gagging, or aspiration during meals; stage IV = severely decompensated abnormal function with weight loss of more than 10% of body weight over 6 months due to dysphagia, or severe aspiration with bronchopulmonary complications, nonoral feeding recommended for most of nutrition, and stage V = nonoral feeding for all nutrition. Conclusions: The FOSS was successful for staging various adult patients with dysphagia into clinically useful, overall performance categories. It has been applied successfully to retrospective outcome studies and to clinical management by clinicians from different specialties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000016941

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Salassa, J.
Venue
Digestive Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1999
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
230-234
ISSN
  • 0257-2753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9875
OpenAlex
W2055859269
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000016941
The paper
Salassa, J. (1999). A Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale for Staging Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. Digestive Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016941

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.