Cited by 71Nail Diseases and TreatmentsFungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Tinea capitis Dermatophytes: Susceptibility to Antifungal Drugs Tested in vitro and in vivo

Mock, M., Monod, M., Baudraz-Rosselet, F., Panizzon, R.G.·1998·Dermatology

Abstract

Background: Tinea capitis is a worldwide-spread infection of the scalp caused by dermatophytes and is predominantly seen in children. The clinical manifestations range from mild scaling lesions to widespread alopecia or highly inflammatory suppurating lesions. Terbinafine and itraconazole seem to be promising therapies with shorter treatment durations than griseofulvin. Objective: The objective of the present study was to test the sensitivity of different species of dermatophytes towards terbinafine and itraconazole, and to compare the results with a retrospective study on 35 immunocompetent patients with tinea capitis who were treated with terbinafine (Lamisil®). Methods: Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were measured with an agar dilution method. Results: Each tested species of dermatophyte was sensitive to terbinafine and itraconazole at different concentration ranges. The MIC for terbinafine ranged from 0.005 to 0.5 μg/ml and for itraconazole from 40 to 80 μg/ml. Microsporum canis was the dermatophyte least sensitive to terbinafine. Our retrospective study showed that the cure rate was excellent for Trichophyton violaceum and T. soudanense, variable for T. mentagrophytes and poor for M. canis and M. langeronii. Conclusions: (i) Regarding the results of susceptibility tests obtained with species involved in tinea capitis, clinical efficacy is not related to MIC measured in vitro; (ii) identification of the isolated dermatophyte from tinea capitis seems to be important for choosing the appropriate treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000018032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agar dilution has been used for antifungal agent-drug combinations against Candida sp., Aspergillus, Fusarium and dermatophytes.

    “It has been also used for antifungal agent-drugs combinations against Candida sp., Aspergillus, Fusarium and dermatophytes [80], [81], [82], [83].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mock, M., Monod, M., Baudraz-Rosselet, F., & Panizzon, R. G.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Dermatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1998
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
361-367
ISSN
  • 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9832
OpenAlex
W1981699940
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
tinea capitis, dermatophytes, antifungal susceptibility, terbinafine, itraconazole, griseofulvin, minimum inhibitory concentration, Microsporum canis, Trichophyton violaceum, Trichophyton soudanense, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, cure rate, species identification, pediatric fungal infection
MeSH terms
Terbinafine, Antifungal Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Dermatomycoses, Arthrodermataceae, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Microsporum, Naphthalenes, Retrospective Studies, Switzerland, Tinea Capitis, Trichophyton, Itraconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review