The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visual Contributions to Postural Stability in Older Adults
Abstract
Background: With advancing age, there is a generalized reduction in visual functioning which has been associated with impaired postural stability and increased risk of falls. However, little is known about which visual abilities are the most important in the control of postural sway when standing. Objective: To determine whether specific visual abilities predict stability when standing on firm and compliant surfaces. Methods: Tests of visual function, peripheral sensation, strength, reaction time and sway were administered to 156 community-dwelling men and women aged 63–90 years. The visual tests included high- and low-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception, stereopsis and lower visual field size. Postural sway was measured with eyes open on a firm and a compliant foam rubber surface. Results: On the firm surface, sway was significantly associated with only one sensorimotor measure: proprioception in the lower limbs. In contrast, on the compliant surface, sway was associated with all of the visual measures, quadriceps strength and reaction time. Multiple regression analysis revealed that contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and quadriceps strength were significant independent predictors of total sway when subjects stood on the compliant surface. Conclusion: The study findings confirm the importance of vision, in particular contrast sensitivity and stereopsis, in the control of posture under challenging conditions, and suggest some mechanisms for the association between impaired vision and falls in older people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Visual loss and falls: a review
Dhital, A., Pey, T., & Stanford, M. R. (2010) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2010.60 · Cited by 193
Adaptations of walking pattern on a compliant surface to regulate dynamic stability
MacLellan, M. J., & Patla, A. E. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0399-5 · Cited by 165
Mergner, T., Schweigart, G., Maurer, C., & Blümle, A. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0065-3 · Cited by 144
Liu-Ambrose, T., Khan, K. M., Donaldson, M. G., Eng, J. J., Lord, S. R., & McKay, H. A. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/61.8.832 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, S. R., & Menz, H. B.
- Venue
- Gerontology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 306-310
- ISSN
- 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0003
- OpenAlex
- W2028348744
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Contributions to Postural Stability in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000022182
- The paper
- Lord, S. R., & Menz, H. B. (2000). Visual Contributions to Postural Stability in Older Adults. Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.