Cited by 157

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reversal of Primary Root Caries Using Dentifrices Containing 5,000 and 1,100 ppm Fluoride

·2001·Caries Research

Abstract

This study compared the ability of two sodium fluoride dentifrices, one containing 5,000 ppm fluoride (Prevident 5000 Plus) and the other 1,100 ppm fluoride (Winterfresh Gel), to reverse primary root caries lesions (PRCLs). A total of 201 subjects with at least one PRCL each entered the study and were randomly allocated to use one of the dentifrices. After 6 months, 186 subjects were included in statistical analyses. At baseline and after 3 and 6 months, the lesions were clinically assessed and their electrical resistance measured using an electrical caries monitor. After 3 months, 39 (38.2%) of the 102 subjects in the 5,000 ppm F– group and 9 (10.7%) of 84 subjects using the 1,100 ppm F– dentifrice, had one or more PRCLs which had hardened (p = 0.005). Between baseline and 3 months, the log 10 mean ± SD resistance values of lesions for subjects in the 1,100 ppm F– group had decreased by 0.06±0.55, whereas those in the 5,000 ppm F– group had increased by 0.40±0.64 (p<0.001). After 6 months, 58 (56.9%) of the subjects in the 5,000 ppm F– group and 24 (28.6%) in the 1,100 ppm F– group had one or more PRCLs that had become hard (p = 0.002). Between baseline and 6 months, the log 10 mean ± SD resistance values of lesions for subjects in the 1,100 ppm F– group decreased by 0.004±0.70, whereas in the 5,000 ppm F– group, they increased by 0.56±0.76 (p<0.001). After 3 and 6 months, the distance from the apical border of the root caries lesions to the gingival margin increased significantly in the 5,000 ppm F– group when compared with the 1,100 ppm F– group. The plaque index in the 5,000 ppm F– group was also significantly reduced when compared with the 1,100 ppm F– group. The colour of the lesions remained unchanged. It was concluded that the dentifrice containing 5,000 ppm F– was significantly better at remineralising PRCLs than the one containing 1,100 ppm F–.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000047429

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2000-12-22
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
157
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review