Molecular analysis of clonality in ovarian endometrial cysts
Abstract
Ovarian endometrial cysts, one of the typical manifestations of endometriosis, are classified as tumor-like lesions rather than as neoplasms. Clonality analysis provides important information on the histogenesis and progression of neoplastic diseases. It is generally accepted that most neoplasms are monoclonal in origin, while the clonality of endometrial cysts remains uncertain. In our study, the clonality of endometrial cysts was analyzed by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on restriction fragment length polymorphism of the X chromosome-linked human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) and on random inactivation of the gene by methylation. We separated 21 fresh epithelial cell samples from 11 endometrial cysts and found that all were monoclonal in the methylation pattern of the human androgen receptor alleles. Moreover, in each of the five cysts where epithelial cells were sampled from multiple areas, the methylation patterns of all samples from a single cyst were identical. These data indicate that endometrial cysts are monoclonal in origin and suggest their neoplastic potential.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endometriosis lesions are clonal, as demonstrated for typical, deep, and cystic ovarian endometriosis.
“Endometriosis lesions are clonal, as demonstrated for typical (149), deep (150), and cystic ovarian (151-153) endometriosis.”
From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [152]
Deep and cystic ovarian endometriosis are consistently found to be clonal in origin.
“A strong argument is that deep (174, 175) and cystic (176-178) ovarian endometriosis are consistently found to be clonal in origin.”
From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [177]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Yano, T., Jimbo, H., Yoshikawa, H., Tsutsumi, O., & Taketani, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Venue
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- Suppl. 1
- Pages
- 41-46
- ISSN
- 0378-7346 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-002X
- OpenAlex
- W2000562460
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometrioma, endometriotic cysts, clonality, monoclonal origin, androgen receptor gene, HUMARA, DNA methylation, X chromosome inactivation, tumor-like lesions, neoplastic potential
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alleles, Cell Separation, Clone Cells, DNA, Dosage Compensation, Genetic, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Cysts, Receptors, Androgen, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Trinucleotide Repeats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review