A morphological and morphometrical study of the retina in aging SAM mice
Abstract
We investigated whether neuronal cell loss occurred as a part of normal aging of the retina in the Senescence-Accelerated Mouse, strains SAMP1 and SAMR1, and in the BALB/c mouse. All three strains showed age-related atrophy of the retina after histologically normal development. Morphometrical study revealed the following facts. The rate of loss of photoreceptor cells in the peripheral retina was greater than in the central retina in all three strains. In the central retina, the rate of loss of photoreceptor cells was greater in the SAMP1 and SAMR1 mice than in the BALB/c mice. In the peripheral retinal, the SAMR1 and SAMP1 strains had fewer cells than the BALB/c strain at all ages, but the rate of loss of these cells did not differ among the three strains. The rate of loss of ganglion cells did not differ between the peripheral and central retinas in the three strains. The SAMR1 and SAMP1 strains had fewer ganglion cells in the peripheral retina than the BALB/c strain at all ages. Because the rate of age-related loss of these cells in SAMP1 mice was not accelerated, and they were short-lived, SAMP1 mice did not show marked age-related loss. On the contrary, the SAMR1 mice showed a marked loss of photoreceptor cells and ganglion cells late in life because of their longer life span, and we propose that this strain is a suitable animal model for the study of mechanisms of age-related loss of neuronal cells in the retina.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By 25 months of age, SAMR1 mice had near complete loss of the photoreceptor layer peripherally and significant loss of the photoreceptor and ganglion cells centrally.
“By 25 months of age, SAMR1 mice had near complete loss of the photoreceptor layer peripherally and significant loss of the photoreceptor and ganglion cells centrally”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Shoji et al., 1998
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Shoji, M., Okada, M., Ohta, A., Higuchi, K., Hosokawa, M., & Honda, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Venue
- Ophthalmic Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-179
- ISSN
- 0030-3747 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0259
- OpenAlex
- W1987588502
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- retinal aging, photoreceptor loss, retinal ganglion cells, neuronal loss, senescence-accelerated mice, SAMP1, SAMR1, BALB/c mice, peripheral retina, central retina
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Atrophy, Cell Count, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Mutant Strains, Photoreceptor Cells, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review