The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluoride Is Unable to Reduce Dental Erosion from Soft Drinks
Abstract
The main aim of the present study was to compare the erosive capabilities of some fruit-flavoured drinks, fresh or saturated with CaF 2, with their content of acids and with previous results from some carbonated soft drinks. The other aim was to measure and compare the rates of dissolution of CaF 2 in some carbonated and non-carbonated drinks and water. Seven commercially available fruit-flavoured drinks were diluted for drinking. Two human molars, each with two approximately 4 × 4 mm windows, were exposed continuously to 500 ml of each drink with or without prior equilibration with CaF 2 under gentle agitation for 48 h. The depths of the erosions were then measured on microradiographs made from sections. Dissolution rate of CaF 2 was measured by suspending 0.5 g of the salt in 0.5 litre of the drinks for 2, 10 and 60 min followed by solution analysis. The pH of the drinks was 2.83–3.51. The amount of NaOH required to bring pH to 5.5 ranged from 12–42 mmol/l, which is more than the amount necessary for most carbonated soft drinks. Equilibration with CaF 2 gave total fluoride concentrations of 3–8 ppm. The depths of the lesions induced by the drinks without added fluoride were 450–625 µm whilst those developed by the drinks equilibrated with CaF 2 were 350–625 µm. The dissolution of CaF 2 was faster in the carbonated drinks and in distilled water than in the non-carbonated drinks. In conclusion, non-carbonated fruit-flavoured drinks contain considerable amounts of acids which, in vitro, induce erosions in teeth similar to those induced by carbonated soft drinks. Saturation with CaF 2 reduced the in vitro development of erosions by 28% induced by drinks with pH above 3; in drinks with pH below 3, erosions were not affected by pH, despite total fluoride concentrations of up to 20 ppm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Two Fluoridation Measures on Erosion Progression in Human Enamel and Dentine in situ
Ganss, C., Klimek, J., Brune, V., & Schürmann, A. (2004) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000080587 · Cited by 342
The pH of beverages in the United States
Reddy, A., Norris, D. F., Momeni, S. S., Waldo, B., & Ruby, J. D. (2016) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2015.10.019 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, M. J., & Richards, A.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-80
- ISSN
- 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-976X
- OpenAlex
- W1982317346
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluoride Is Unable to Reduce Dental Erosion from Soft Drinks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000057595
- The paper
- Larsen, M. J., & Richards, A. (2002). Fluoride Is Unable to Reduce Dental Erosion from Soft Drinks. Caries Research. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.