The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Latest Industry Information on the Safety Profile of Levofloxacin in the US
Abstract
This paper reviews the safety data for levofloxacin utilizing reports from clinical and post-marketing surveillance trials. The side effect incidence rates are 1.3% for nausea, 0.1% for anxiety, 0.3% for insomnia, and 0.1% for headache. No levofloxacin-related adverse events were reported at a rate higher than 1.3%, and most were lower. Four clinical trials were reported. Levofloxacin achieved superior clinical and microbiological results compared to ceftriaxone/macrolide combination, and was better tolerated. Results comparing IV azithromycin plus ceftriaxone versus 500 mg levofloxacin in hospitalised CAP demonstrated that levofloxacin performed better, with more adverse events associated with the comparators (levofloxacin 5.3%, comparators 9.3%). High-dose levofloxacin (750 mg) was also evaluated and found to be well tolerated. Surveillance data reported low ADR rates for levofloxacin: nausea 0.8%, rash 0.5%, abdominal pain 0.4%, and diarrhoea, dizziness, and vomiting 0.3%. Worldwide and US surveillance data confirmed that tendon rupture occurred in less than 4 per million prescriptions, taste perversion in less than 3 per million, convulsions in 2 per million, and photosensitivity, hepatitis, hepatic failure, QT prolongation, torsade de pointes or empyema all in less than 1 per million.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, there are documented reports of hepatotoxicity with levofloxacin, but these occurred in individuals aged 65 years and above51, and a post-market surveillance report documented the incidence of DILI to be less than 1 in a million people52.”
From Performance assessment and economic analysis of a human Liver-Chip for predictive toxicology (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Performance assessment and economic analysis of a human Liver-Chip for predictive toxicology
Ewart, L., Apostolou, A., Briggs, S. A., Carman, C. V., Chaff, J. T., Heng, A. R., Jadalannagari, S., Janardhanan, J., Jang, K.-J., Joshipura, S. R., et al. (2022) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-022-00209-1 · Cited by 337
Baudy, A. R., Otieno, M. A., Hewitt, P., Gan, J., Roth, A., Keller, D., Sura, R., Van Vleet, T. R., & Proctor, W. R. (2020) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c9lc00768g · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahn, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kahn, James B.
- ORCID
- Kahn, James B.
- Venue
- Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 32-37
- ISSN
- 0009-3157 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9794
- OpenAlex
- W1994098506
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
- Keywords
- levofloxacin, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, post-marketing surveillance, clinical trials, community-acquired pneumonia, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, tendon rupture, QT prolongation, photosensitivity, nausea, drug tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Infective Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Industry, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Reproducibility of Results, Ofloxacin, Treatment Outcome, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Drug Approval, Levofloxacin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review