The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1
Abstract
The ploidy of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) enzymatically isolated from the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (elastic arteries), caudal artery (small muscular artery) and the small mesenteric arteries and arterioles (mesenteric resistance vessels) of the spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats at ages 12, 26, 32 and 40 weeks was determined by flow cytometric DNA analysis and Feulgen-DNA photometric measurements. Frequency of polyploid cells in the aorta and superior mesenteric artery of the SHR increased from 4.43 ± 1.35 and 7.58 ± 1.69%, respectively, at 12 weeks to 31.26 ± 3.00 and 14.13 ± 1.30% at 40 weeks. There was a smaller increase in the percentage of polyploid cells in these two vessels of the WKY from 4.73 ± 0.74 and 5.82 ± 0.33%, respectively, at 12 weeks to 10.64 ± 0.17 and 7.68 ± 0.64% at 40 weeks. The caudal artery and mesenteric resistance vessels showed no significant increase in the percentage of 4N (tetraploid) cells in the SHR from 12 weeks (6.80 ± 0.92 and 6.10 ± 0.75%) to 40 weeks (7.83 ± 0.67 and 7.57 ± 0.07%). Similarly, there was no significant change in ploidy in these arteries of the WKY. Hence, while polyploidy of SMCs increases in the aorta and superior mesenteric artery of the rat with increasing age and with duration of hypertension, there is no significant change in the number of polyploid cells in smaller vessels such as the caudal artery or mesenteric resistance vessels. Since it is the resistance vessels that are involved in the development and maintenance of hypertension, polyploidy of SMCs in the blood vessel wall appears to hold little relevance to the etiology of this disease. As well, increased incidence of polyploidy is not directly attributable to increases in blood pressure as the caudal artery has a high systolic pressure in the SHR yet the incidence of polyploid cells in this artery does not differ from
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boring, L., Gosling, J., Cleary, M., & Charo, I. F. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29788 · Cited by 1,965
Cited by
The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation
Charo, I. F., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra052723 · Cited by 2,523
Izikson, L., Klein, R. S., Charo, I. F., Weiner, H. L., & Luster, A. D. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.192.7.1075 · Cited by 584
Stamatovic, S. M., Keep, R. F., Kunkel, S. L., & Andjelkovic, A. V. (2003) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.00755 · Cited by 381
Perera, T. D., Dwork, A. J., Keegan, K. A., Thirumangalakudi, L., Lipira, C. M., Joyce, N., Lange, C., Higley, J. D., Rosoklija, G., Hen, R., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017600 · Cited by 244
Kyriakides, T. R., Foster, M. J., Keeney, G. E., Tsai, A., Giachelli, C. M., Clark-Lewis, I., Rollins, B. J., & Bornstein, P. (2004) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63265-8 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, L., Tseng, S. C., & Rollins, B. J.
- Venue
- Chemical Immunology and Allergy
- Publisher
- KARGER
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 7-29
- OpenAlex
- W1486677432
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000058723
- The paper
- Gu, L., Tseng, S. C., & Rollins, B. J. (1999). Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1. Chemical Immunology and Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1159/000058723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.