The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Outcome of Myocardial Infarction in Patients Treated with Aspirin Is Enhanced by Pre-Hospital Administration
Abstract
Objective: Reducing time to reperfusion therapy is one of the goals in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We assessed the association between timing of aspirin administration and outcome of patients with AMI. Patients: We studied 922 consecutive AMI patients with ST-segment elevation in Killip class I–III on admission. Patients were divided into two groups based upon the timing of emergency aspirin administration: before (early aspirin users) or after (late aspirin users) hospital admission. Results: Early aspirin users (n = 338; 37%) were younger, less likely to be women, and more likely to smoke (p < 0.006) than late users (n = 584; 63%). Other baseline and clinical characteristics were similar. Early aspirin users were more likely to be treated with thrombolysis or primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Compared with late users, early aspirin users had significantly lower in-hospital complications and lower mortality rates at 7 (2.4 vs. 7.3%, p = 0.002) and 30 days (4.9 vs. 11.1%, p = 0.001). By multivariate adjustment, pre-hospital aspirin was an independent determinant of survival at 7 (odds ratio 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.18–0.92) and at 30 days (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.32–1.08). Survival benefit associated with aspirin persisted for subgroups treated or not with reperfusion therapy. Conclusions: Outcome of AMI patients treated with aspirin is improved by pre-hospital administration.Our findings suggest that emergency pre-hospital aspirin might facilitate early reperfusion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No RCTs were identified for aspirin; all 3 included citations were non-RCTs.
“No RCTs were identified, and all 3 identified citations were non-RCTs.15–17”
From Prehospital Administration of Aspirin and Nitroglycerin for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome ― A Systematic Review ― (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
There was no significant difference in reinfarction between prehospital aspirin administration and control groups.
“For the critical outcome of reinfarction and stroke, and for the important outcome of major hemorrhage, there were no significant differences between the prehospital administration and control groups.”
From Prehospital Administration of Aspirin and Nitroglycerin for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome ― A Systematic Review ― (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Prehospital aspirin administration by non-physician healthcare professionals to patients with suspected ACS/AMI is associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with no prehospital aspirin administration (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99).
“Prehospital aspirin administration was associated with significantly lower 30-day and 1-year mortality compared with aspirin administration after arrival at hospital, with odds ratios (OR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.36–0.62), respectively.”
From Prehospital Administration of Aspirin and Nitroglycerin for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome ― A Systematic Review ― (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 104
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1053/euhj.1998.1106 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.273.19.1509 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02514-7 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbash, I. M., Freimark, D., Gottlieb, S., Hod, H., Hasin, Y., Battler, A., Crystal, E., Matetzky, S., Boyko, V., Mandelzweig, L., Behar, S., & Leor, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Rabin Medical Center (IL)
- Venue
- Cardiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-147
- ISSN
- 0008-6312 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9751
- OpenAlex
- W1999849511
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
- Keywords
- acute myocardial infarction, aspirin, timing of drug administration, ST-segment elevation, reperfusion therapy, mortality, in-hospital complications, thrombolysis, primary percutaneous coronary intervention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anticoagulants, Aspirin, Coronary Disease, Data Collection, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Follow-Up Studies, Heparin, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Admission, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Syndrome, Time Factors, Transportation of Patients, Myocardial Reperfusion, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Incidence, Prevalence, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review