The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Prospective Trial to Assess the Role of Saline Hydration on the Development of Contrast Nephrotoxicity
Abstract
Though simple and attractive, the role of hydration for the prophylaxis of contrast nephrotoxicity has not been definitively established. We prospectively evaluated the role of deliberate saline hydration in patients undergoing nonemergency cardiac catheterization. Patients (n = 53) were randomized on the day prior to scheduled catheterization to one of two groups – group 1 (n = 27) received normal saline for 24 h (at a rate of 1 ml/kg/h) beginning 12 h prior to scheduled catheterization, and group 2 (n = 26) were allowed unrestricted oral fluids. Serum creatinine measured 24 and 48 h postcardiac catheterization was compared to the pre-randomization baseline value. The mean baseline calculated creatinine clearance was 79.6 ± 31.9 ml/min and the mean baseline creatinine was 106 ± 28 µmol/l. An increase in serum creatinine by at least 44.2 µmol/l (0.5 mg/dl), within 48 h of contrast exposure, was considered to represent clinically significant acute renal insufficiency. Ten subjects (18.9%) developed acute renal insufficiency. The incidence of acute renal insufficiency was significantly lower in group 1 (1 out of 27) as compared to group 2 (9 out of 26; p = 0.005 for comparison between groups; relative risk 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.015 to 0.79). Twenty-four hours after contrast exposure, the mean increase in creatinine was less in group 1 vs. group 2 (8 ± 11 vs. 20 ± 21 µmol/l, p = 0.02). The increase in creatinine was not significantly different in group 1 vs. group 2 48 h after contrast exposure (12 ± 21 vs. 29 ± 40 µmol/l, p = 0.17). Deliberate saline hydration decreases the incidence of contrast-related acute renal failure and the severity of contrast-induced renal dysfunction in patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac catheterization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Writing Committee Members, Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., Bailey, S. R., Bittl, J. A., Cercek, B., Chambers, C. E., Ellis, S. G., Guyton, R. A., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31823ba622 · Cited by 3,289
Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury
Hoste, E. A. J., Kellum, J. A., Selby, N. M., Zarbock, A., Palevsky, P. M., Bagshaw, S. M., Goldstein, S. L., Cerdá, J., & Chawla, L. S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0 · Cited by 1,486
Writing Committee Members, Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., Bailey, S. R., Bittl, J. A., Cercek, B., Chambers, C. E., Ellis, S. G., Guyton, R. A., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31823a5596 · Cited by 632
The ad-hoc working group of ERBP:, Fliser, D., Laville, M., Covic, A., Fouque, D., Vanholder, R., Juillard, L., & Van Biesen, W. (2012) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs375 · Cited by 573
Levey, A. S., & James, M. T. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/aitc201711070 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Trivedi, H. S., Moore, H., Nasr, S., Aggarwal, K., Agrawal, A., Goel, P., & Hewett, J.
- Venue
- Nephron Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2004-11-17
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- c29-c34
- ISSN
- 1660-2110 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106421953
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Prospective Trial to Assess the Role of Saline Hydration on the Development of Contrast Nephrotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000066641
- The paper
- Trivedi, H. S., Moore, H., Nasr, S., Aggarwal, K., Agrawal, A., Goel, P., & Hewett, J. (2004). A Randomized Prospective Trial to Assess the Role of Saline Hydration on the Development of Contrast Nephrotoxicity. Nephron Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.