Cerebrospinal Fluid Beta-Amyloid 42 Is Reduced before the Onset of Sporadic Dementia: A Population-Based Study in 85-Year-Olds
Abstract
Deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) is an early pathogenic event in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We measured Aβ42 and Aβ40 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a population-based sample of 85-year-olds, 27 demented and 35 non-demented. During the following 3 years, 7 of the 35 non-demented individuals had developed dementia, while 28 remained non-demented. Reduced CSF levels of both Aβ42 (p = 0.001) and Aβ40 (p = 0.0001) were found in patients with manifest AD and vascular dementia at the age of 85. Non-demented individuals who developed dementia during follow-up had lower levels of CSF- Aβ42 (p = 0.003), but not CSF-Aβ40 (p = 0.96), than those who remained non-demented. The odds ratio for development of dementia was 8.2 (p = 0.027) for individuals in the lower 50th percentile of CSF-Aβ42, while none of those in the highest 33rd percentile of CSF-Aβ42 developed dementia during follow-up. There were no significant differences between carriers and non-carriers of the apolipoprotein E Ε4 allele regarding CSF-Aβ42or CSF-Aβ40.Our study suggests that low CSF-Aβ42 is found also in an unselected population-based sample of old demented patients and provides the first evidence of a disturbance in the metabolism of Aβ, specifically involving Aβ42, before the onset of clinical symptoms in AD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal amyloid biomarkers have more rapid progression of atrophy, hypometabolism, and clinical/cognitive decline than individuals without biomarker evidence of Aβ deposition.
“Numerous studies have shown that CU individuals with abnormal amyloid biomarkers have more rapid progression of atrophy, hypometabolism, and clinical/cognitive decline than individuals without biomarker evidence of Aβ deposition [13,33,80,93–99]”
From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- Skoog, I., Davidsson, P., Aevarsson, Ó., Vanderstichele, H., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Fujirebio (Belgium) (BE)
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-176
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- OpenAlex
- W1985262420
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta 42, Aβ40, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, preclinical dementia, amyloid metabolism, APOE ε4, dementia risk prediction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Dementia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Peptide Fragments, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Protein Isoforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review