Cited by 81Primate Behavior and EcologyAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The Scaling of White Matter to Gray Matter in Cerebellum and Neocortex

Bush, Eliot C., Allman, John M.·2003·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

It is known that the white matter of neocortex increases disproportionately with brain size. However, relatively few measurements have been made of white matter/gray matter scaling in the cerebellum. We present data on the volumes of white and gray matter in both structures, taken from 45 species of mammals. We find a scaling exponent of 1.13 for cerebellum and 1.28 for neocortex. The 95% confidence intervals for our estimates of these two exponents do not overlap. This difference likely reflects differences in the connectivity and/or micro-structure of white matter in the two regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000068880

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the cerebellum, there is a much less steep increase in white matter volume with overall size than in the neocortex.

    “In the cerebellum, there is a much less steep increase in white matter volume with overall size (figure 1b; and see [47]).”

    From Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum (2012) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Larger cortices are increasingly made up of white rather than grey matter.

    “larger cortices are increasingly made up of white rather than grey matter (figure 1a, see also [46,47]).”

    From Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum (2012) · cites this paper as [47]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 81

Authors
Bush, E. C., & Allman, J. M.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2003
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
OpenAlex
W2021032796
Cited by
81
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey011759-05)
  • National Eye Institute (EY11759)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007737, GM-07737)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
white matter, gray matter, cerebellum, neocortex, brain size scaling, scaling exponents, mammalian brain, white matter volume, brain microstructure, brain connectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cerebellum, Mammals, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review