The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS Syndrome): An Update
Abstract
Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rather distinct severe adverse drug reaction characterised by skin rash, fever, lymph node enlargement and internal organ involvement. Our aim was to review the available data regarding the management of this probably underrecognised subset of drug reaction. So far, the only undisputed way to treat severe hypersensitivity reactions is prompt withdrawal of the offending drug. The use of systemic corticosteroids remains controversial. The benefit of therapies aimed at accelerating the elimination of the causative drug deserves further studies. In the absence of a well-established therapy, primary and secondary prevention have a key role in the management of DRESS syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Autoimmune(-Like)” drug and herb induced liver injury: new insights into molecular pathogenesis
Sebode, M., Schulz, L., & Lohse, A. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18091954 · Cited by 47
Two cases of toxic hepatitis caused by arrowroot juice
Kim, S. Y., Yim, H. J., Ahn, J. H., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. N., Yoon, I., Kim, D. I., Lee, H. S., Lee, S. W., & Choi, J. H. (2009) · The Korean Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.4.504 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Tas, S., & Simonart, T.
- Venue
- Dermatology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-356
- ISSN
- 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9832
- OpenAlex
- W2103649687
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.