Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Pancreatic Necrosectomy

Connor, S., Ghaneh, P., Raraty, M., Sutton, R., Rosso, E., Garvey, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Evans, J.C., Rowlands, P., Neoptolemos, J.P.·2003·Digestive Surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Open surgery for pancreatic necrosis is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We report the results of a recently developed minimally invasive technique that we adopted in 1998. Methods: A descriptive explanation of the approach is given together with the results of a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy (MIRP) between August 1998 and April 2002. Patients: There were 24 patients with a median (range) age of 61 (29–75) years. The initial median (range) APACHE II score was 8 (2–21). All patients had infected pancreatic necrosis with at least 50% pancreatic necrosis. In three patients it was not possible to complete the first MIRP because of technical reasons. Results: A total of 88 procedures were performed with a median (range) of 4 (0–8) per patient. Twenty-one (88%) patients developed 36 complications during the course of their illness. Five patients required an additional open procedure: 2 for subsequent distant collections, 2 for bleeding and 1 for persisting sepsis and a distant abscess. Six (25%) patients who had MIRP died. The median (range) post-operative hospital stay was 51 (5–200) days. Conclusions: MIRP is a new technique that has shown promising results, and could be preferable to open pancreatic necrosectomy in selected patients. However, unresolved issues remain to be overcome and the exact role of MIRP in the management of pancreatic necrosis has yet to be defined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000071184

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Connor, S., Ghaneh, P., Raraty, M., Sutton, R., Rosso, E., Garvey, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Evans, J. C., Rowlands, P., & Neoptolemos, J. P.
Venue
Digestive Surgery
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2003
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
270-277
ISSN
  • 0253-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9883
OpenAlex
W2134436503
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Pancreatic Necrosectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000071184
The paper
Connor, S., Ghaneh, P., Raraty, M., Sutton, R., Rosso, E., Garvey, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Evans, J. C., Rowlands, P., & Neoptolemos, J. P. (2003). Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Pancreatic Necrosectomy. Digestive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.