Cardiac function in fetuses of poorly-controlled pre-gestational diabetic pregnancies—A pilot study
Abstract
Objective: Cardiac impairment is frequently found in babies of diabetic mothers. It is still controversial whether this is due to poor glucose control. The aim of this study is to compare the cardiac function in fetuses of well- and poorly-controlled pre-gestational diabetic pregnancy in third trimester. Methods: Women with type 1 pre-gestational diabetes were enrolled at 30–32 weeks. Cardiac size and interventricular septal wall thickness were measured by M-mode at end-diastolic phase. The right and left ventricular ejection fractions were calculated. At the mitral and tricuspid valves inflow, the ratio between early ventricular filling and active atrial filling (E/A) at both atrioventricular valves were measured by Doppler echocardiography. Peak velocities of ascending aorta and pulmonary artery were assessed. The angle of isonation was kept at <20°. Women with poorly-controlled diabetes (HbA1c >6.5%) were compared with those with satisfactorily controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤6.5%). Results: A total of 21 women with pre-gestational diabetes were recruited for this study. Eight women with well-controlled diabetes were compared with 9 women who had poorly-controlled diabetes. HbA1c in the poorly-controlled group was 7.3% and in the well-controlled group it was 5.4% (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in cardiac size, interventricular septal wall thickness, ejection fraction, aorta and pulmonary artery peak flow velocities. The right atrioventricular E/A ratio was significantly lower among the poorly-controlled diabetic pregnancies (0.71 vs. 0.54; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Fetuses of poorly-controlled diabetic mothers had a lower right atrioventricular E/A ratio. This may be due to metabolic acidosis, non-hypertrophic cardiac dysfunction or fetal polycythemia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fetal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a well-recognized feature of gestational diabetes mellitus, though it was believed that this resolved within a few months of birth.
“Fetal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a well-recognized feature of GDM, though it was believed that this resolved within a few months of birth [78,79,80,81,82].”
From Recent Experimental Studies of Maternal Obesity, Diabetes during Pregnancy and the Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Wong, S. F., Chan, F. Y., Cincotta, R. B., McIntyre, H. D., & Oats, J. J. N.
- Affiliations
- Mater Mothers' Hospital (AU)
- Venue
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-116
- ISSN
- 0378-7346 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-002X
- OpenAlex
- W2000143666
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Keywords
- pregestational diabetes, type 1 diabetes, fetal cardiac function, glycemic control, HbA1c, right ventricular ejection fraction, fetal polycythemia, metabolic acidosis, third trimester
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Fetal Heart, Gestational Age, Heart Atria, Heart Ventricles, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review