Efficacy of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorders
Abstract
Background: Generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) are amongst the most prevalent mental disorders. Recent studies have suggested that cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for GAD. A controlled clinical trial was done to evaluate the efficacy of CBT treatment in outpatients with pure GAD who were treated by a therapist working in routine care. Methods: Seventy-two outpatients, fulfilling GAD criteria according to DSM-IV, were included in the study. From this group, 36 patients (CBT-A) were randomly assigned to 25 sessions of CBT and the other 36 formed a contact control group (CCG). After the contact control period (CC period), these patients were also treated with CBT (CBT-B), allowing not only a parallel group comparison but also an A-B comparison. Therapists were licensed full-time psychologists who worked routinely in outpatient care and had a professional training in CBT. Treatment was done in accordance with a manual, and treatment conformity was controlled by several methods. Results: The reduction in the score on the Hamilton Anxiety Observer Rating Scale was 6.4% (1.5 points) in the CCG, 35.4% (9.5 points) in the CBT-A and 47.3% (10.3 points) in the CBT-B. In the self-rating Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a reduction of 2.7% was seen in CCG, 14.6% in CBT-A, and 11.6% in CBT-B. According to the Clinical Global Impression Rating, 65.6% of patients were still at least moderately ill at the end of the CC period, while this rate was 33.4% at the end of CBT-A, or 15.7% at the end of CBT-B. All these differences between treatment and control group are statistically highly significant. The clinical improvement remained stable over a follow-up period of 8 months. Conclusions: CBT is an effective method of treatment for GAD. Differences between control and treatment group are comparable to or larger than those reported in studies on antidepressant drugs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effectiveness of multimodal behavioral therapies for GAD has been repeatedly empirically demonstrated.
“Auch wenn die Effektivität multimodaler Verhaltenstherapien bei der Generalisierten Angststörung wiederholt empirisch nachgewiesen wurde [Linden et al, 2005;Übersicht: Ruhmland und Margraf, 2001]”
From Wann sind Sorgen pathologisch? (2009) · cites this paper as Linden et al, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Linden, M., Zubraegel, D., Baer, T., Franke, U., & Schlattmann, P.
- Affiliations
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2004-12-23
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-42
- ISSN
- 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0348
- OpenAlex
- W2080246463
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment efficacy, outpatient psychotherapy, anxiety symptoms, long-term treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review