Cited by 10Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Neurotrophic Factor Expression after Focal Brain Ischemia Preceded by Different Preconditioning Strategies

Pera, Joanna, Zawadzka, Malgorzata, Kaminska, Bozena, Szczudlik, Andrzej·2005·Cerebrovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background: Both prolonged brain ischemia and preconditioning (PC) induce expression of neurotrophic factors. However, the influence of PC on their expression after a long-term ischemia remains vague. Previously, we have found various effects of PC on mRNA levels of different cytokines after focal brain ischemia. Thus, we investigated mRNA expression of nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and ciliary neurotrophic factor after 90-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) preceded by ischemic or chemical PC. Methods: MCAo was induced in rats using the suture method. PC had been carried out 3 days earlier. There were 4 experimental groups: MCAo alone; ischemic PC and MCAo; chemical PC and MCAo, and sham-operated rats. Expression of mRNAs in the ipsi- and contralateral cortex was studied by semiquantitative RT-PCR at 12 and 24 h after MCAo. Results: Despite clearly neuroprotective effects of both PC strategies, mRNA levels of neurotrophic factors were similar in tolerant and nontolerant rats. Only BDNF mRNA expression, 12 h after reperfusion, was lower when ischemic PC was applied prior to long-term ischemia. Conclusions: These results suggest that PC generally does not change the expression of neurotrophic factor expression after a long-term focal brain ischemia compared to the nontolerant state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000084088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The upregulation of Bdnf transcription in the ischemic cortex, including the damaged area and periinfarction zone, was shown in our study to correspond with other evidence.

    “The upregulation of Bdnf transcription in the ischemic cortex, including the damaged area and periinfarction zone, was shown in our study to correspond with other evidence (Kokaia et al. 1995; Ferrer et al. 2001; Pera et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pera, J., Zawadzka, M., Kaminska, B., & Szczudlik, A.
Affiliations
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL)
Venue
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
247-252
ISSN
  • 1015-9770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9786
OpenAlex
W2083694819
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebrovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
neurotrophic factors, focal cerebral ischemia, preconditioning, ischemic preconditioning, chemical preconditioning, nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, BDNF mRNA expression, middle cerebral artery occlusion, neuroprotection, reperfusion, cerebral cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Brain Ischemia, Male, Nitro Compounds, Propionates, RNA, Messenger, Gene Expression, Rats, Wistar, Ischemic Preconditioning, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Nerve Growth Factor, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review