The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation
Abstract
Despite much research, disagreements abound regarding the detailed charac-teristicsof question intonation in different languages or even in the same language.The present study investigates question intonation in Mandarin by also consideringthe role of focus that is frequently ignored in previous research. In experiment 1,native speakers of Mandarin produced statements, yes/no questions, particle ques-tions,wh-questions, rhetorical questions and confirmation questions with narrowfocus on the initial, medial or final word of the sentence, or on none of the words.Detailed F0 contour analyses showed that focus generated the same pitch rangemodification in questions as in statements, i.e., expanding the pitch range of thefocused word, suppressing (compressing and lowering) that of the post-focuswords, but leaving that of the pre-focus words largely unaffected. When the effects offocus (as well as other functions also potentially present) were controlled by sub-tractingstatement F0 contours from those of the corresponding yes/no questions,the resulting difference curves resembled exponential or even double-exponentialfunctions. Further F0 analyses also revealed an interaction between focus andinterrogative meaning in the form of a boost to the pitch raising by the question start-ingfrom the focused word. Finally, subtle differences in the amount of pitch raisingwere also observed among different types of questions, especially at the sentence-finalposition. Experiment 2 investigated whether listeners could detect both focusand question in the same utterance. Results showed that listeners could identifyboth in most cases, indicating that F0 variations related to the two functions could besimultaneously transmitted. Meanwhile, the lowest identification rates were foundfor neutral focus in questions and for statements with final focus. In both cases, theconfusions seemed to arise from the competing F0 adjustments by interrogativemeaning and focus at the sentence-final position. These findings are consistent withthe functional view of intonation, according to which components of intonation aredefined and organized by individual communicative functions that are independentof each other but are encoded in parallel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Švarný, O., Chao, Y. R., & Svarny, O. (1972) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/599674 · Cited by 2,751
The phonology and phonetics of English intonation
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1987) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2,378
Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Beckman, M. E. (1988) · Cited by 869
Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0contours
Xu, Y. (1999) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.1999.0086 · Cited by 786
Self-citationPhonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation
Xu, Y., & Xu, C. X. (2005) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001 · Cited by 517
Self-citationAcoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts
Cooper, W. E., Eady, S. J., & Mueller, P. R. (1985) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.392372 · Cited by 442
趙, 元. (1965) · University of California Press eBooks · Cited by 405
Bolinger, D. L. (1985) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503622906 · Cited by 388
Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions
Eady, S. J., & Cooper, W. E. (1986) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.394091 · Cited by 342
The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese
Field, K. L., & Shen, X.-N. S. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415064 · Cited by 204
Cited by
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Jiang, J., Liu, F., Wan, X., & Jiang, C. (2015) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2370-4 · Cited by 68
Self-citationZhu, M., Chen, X., & Yang, Y. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0005274 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, F., & Xu, Y.
- Venue
- Phonetica
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 70-87
- ISSN
- 0031-8388 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0321
- OpenAlex
- W2038276123
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000090090
- The paper
- Liu, F., & Xu, Y. (2005). Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation. Phonetica. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.