Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Salivary Stimulation on Erosion of Human and Bovine Enamel Subjected or Not to Subsequent Abrasion: An in situ/ex vivo Study

Rios, D., Honório, H.M., Magalhães, A.C., Delbem, A.C.B., Machado, M.A.A.M., Silva, S.M.B., Buzalaf, M.A.R.·2006·Caries Research

Abstract

This in situ/ex vivo study evaluated whether saliva stimulated by chewing gum could prevent or reduce the wear and the percent change in microhardness (%SMH) of bovine and human enamel submitted to erosion followed by brushing abrasion immediately or after 1 h. During 2 experimental 7-day crossover phases, 9 previously selected volunteers wore intraoral palatal devices, with 12 enamel specimens (6 human and 6 bovine). In the first phase, the volunteers immersed the device for 5 min in 150 ml of cola drink, 4 times per day (at 8, 12, 16 and 20 h). Immediately after the immersions, no treatment was performed in 4 specimens, 4 other specimens were immediately brushed (0 min) using a fluoride dentifrice, and the device was replaced into the mouth. After 60 min, the remaining 4 specimens were brushed. In the second phase, the procedures were repeated, but after the immersions, the volunteers stimulated the salivary flow rate by chewing a sugar-free gum for 30 min. Changes in wear and %SMH were measured. ANOVA and Tukey’s test showed statistical differences (p < 0.05) for the following comparisons. The chewing gum promoted less wear and %SMH. A decreasing %SMH and an increasing enamel wear were observed in the following conditions: erosion only, 60 min and 0 min. The human enamel presented greater %SMH and less wear compared to bovine enamel. The data suggest that the salivary stimulation after an erosive or erosive/abrasive attack can reduce the dental wear and the %SMH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000092229

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Rios, D., Honório, H. M., Magalhães, A. C., Delbem, A. C. B., Machado, M. A. A. M., Silva, S. M. B., & Buzalaf, M. A. R.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
218-223
ISSN
  • 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-976X
OpenAlex
W2047082457
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Salivary Stimulation on Erosion of Human and Bovine Enamel Subjected or Not to Subsequent Abrasion: An in situ/ex vivo Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000092229
The paper
Rios, D., Honório, H. M., Magalhães, A. C., Delbem, A. C. B., Machado, M. A. A. M., Silva, S. M. B., & Buzalaf, M. A. R. (2006). Effect of Salivary Stimulation on Erosion of Human and Bovine Enamel Subjected or Not to Subsequent Abrasion: An in situ/ex vivo Study. Caries Research. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092229

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.