Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transversal Wavelength-Independent Microradiography, a Method for Monitoring Caries Lesions over Time, Validated with Transversal Microradiography

Thomas, R.Z., Ruben, J.L., de Vries, J., ten Bosch, J.J., Huysmans, M.C.D.N.J.M.·2006·Caries Research

Abstract

This paper describes a microradiographic method for measuring mineral concentration in a transversal geometry with thick (≤3.2 mm) sections: transversal wavelength-independent microradiography (T-WIM). It was tested on bovine enamel and dentin samples in vitro, and the results were validated with those of transversal microradiography (TMR). 48 enamel and 48 dentin samples (3.2 × 3.2 × 1.5 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin, randomly divided into six groups of 8 dentin or 8 enamel samples, and demineralized for 0 (sound control), 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 weeks. For T-WIM, samples were imaged on film with polychromatic 40-kV Cu X-rays with an Al (0.25 mm)/Ni (0.02 mm) filter together with an aluminium/zinc step wedge. TMR slices (about 80 µm for enamel and about 130 µm for dentine) were subsequently cut from the centre of the samples and subjected to TMR. Microradiographs from both methods were digitized and image analysis software was used to calculate lesion depth and mineral loss. The relations between T-WIM and TMR results for mineral loss (ΔZ) and lesion depth were nearly linear (r ≧ 0.96) for both enamel and dentin. The slopes of the regression lines were between 0.99 and 1.02 except for ΔZ in dentine, which was 0.89. It was concluded that T-WIM is a suitable method for TMR on thick samples.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000093186

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of surface hardness as an indicator of dentine mineral loss has been widely employed because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography, which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine.

    “About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1016%2FS0022-5320%2863%2980017-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1159%2F000070865 · DOI
  3. 10.1159%2F000080580 · DOI
  4. 10.1159%2F000262074 · DOI
  5. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0722.1997.tb00183.x · DOI
  6. 10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F32%2F7%2F008 · DOI
  7. 10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F32%2F10%2F001 · DOI
  8. 10.1159%2F000261547 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, R. Z., Ruben, J. L., de Vries, J., ten Bosch, J. J., & Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
281-291
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review