The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transversal Wavelength-Independent Microradiography, a Method for Monitoring Caries Lesions over Time, Validated with Transversal Microradiography
Abstract
This paper describes a microradiographic method for measuring mineral concentration in a transversal geometry with thick (≤3.2 mm) sections: transversal wavelength-independent microradiography (T-WIM). It was tested on bovine enamel and dentin samples in vitro, and the results were validated with those of transversal microradiography (TMR). 48 enamel and 48 dentin samples (3.2 × 3.2 × 1.5 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin, randomly divided into six groups of 8 dentin or 8 enamel samples, and demineralized for 0 (sound control), 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 weeks. For T-WIM, samples were imaged on film with polychromatic 40-kV Cu X-rays with an Al (0.25 mm)/Ni (0.02 mm) filter together with an aluminium/zinc step wedge. TMR slices (about 80 µm for enamel and about 130 µm for dentine) were subsequently cut from the centre of the samples and subjected to TMR. Microradiographs from both methods were digitized and image analysis software was used to calculate lesion depth and mineral loss. The relations between T-WIM and TMR results for mineral loss (ΔZ) and lesion depth were nearly linear (r ≧ 0.96) for both enamel and dentin. The slopes of the regression lines were between 0.99 and 1.02 except for ΔZ in dentine, which was 0.89. It was concluded that T-WIM is a suitable method for TMR on thick samples.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of surface hardness as an indicator of dentine mineral loss has been widely employed because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography, which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine.
“About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, R. Z., Ruben, J. L., de Vries, J., ten Bosch, J. J., & Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 281-291
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review