Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes

Escudé, Bernard, James, Chris, Deguine, Olivier, Cochard, Nadine, Eter, Elias, Fraysse, Bernard·2006·Audiology and Neurotology

Abstract

Aims: To establish normative data on the size of the basal turn of the cochlea using high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone in adults and children. To determine whether final insertion depth angle for a perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode varies according to cochlear size. Methods: Forty-two patients screened for cochlear anomaly using computed tomography were randomly selected from patients with otologic disease. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears using a 1.0-mm layer, minimum intensity projection. The largest distance from the round window to the lateral wall (distance A) and the perpendicular distance (B) were measured. Distances were averaged between ears for each individual. In addition, 15 patients were implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance electrode array using a linear insertion depth of either 17 mm (n = 9) or 19 mm (n = 6). Postoperative X-rays were analyzed using the method of Xu et al. [Am J Otol 2000;21:49–56] to obtain the insertion depth angles for individual electrodes. Results: Mean distance A was 9.23 mm (SD = 0.53, range 7.9–10.8 mm). Perpendicular distance B was significantly correlated with distance A (r 2 = 0.57, p < 0.001). The mean difference in insertion depth angle between the 17 and 19 mm groups was 80°. A statistically significant correlation (r 2 = 0.51) was found between distance A and the insertion depth angle for the 17 mm group. Conclusions: The cochlear size measure distance A was repeatable to within the resolution of the high-resolution computed tomography image data. The basal turn of the normally formed cochlea is variable in size. These variations in size would produce >5.0 mm variation in the length of the lateral wall to the point consistent with an insertion depth angle of 360°. Cochlear size influenced final insertion depth angles obtained for the perimodiolar Nucleus 24 Contour Advance electrode.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000095611

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Escudé, B., James, C., Deguine, O., Cochard, N., Eter, E., & Fraysse, B.
Venue
Audiology and Neurotology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
11
Issue
Suppl. 1
Pages
27-33
ISSN
  • 1420-3030 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9700
OpenAlex
W2012609656
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000095611
The paper
Escudé, B., James, C., Deguine, O., Cochard, N., Eter, E., & Fraysse, B. (2006). The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes. Audiology and Neurotology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095611

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.