Detection of a novel familial deletion of four genes between BP1 and BP2 of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region by oligo-array CGH in a child with neurological disorder and speech impairment
Abstract
Two common classes of deletions are described in the literature in individuals with Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome (PWS/AS): one between breakpoint 1 (BP1) to BP3 and the other between BP2 to BP3 of the PWS/AS critical region on chromosome 15q11-->q13. We present here a novel observation of an approximately 253-kb deletion between BP1 and BP2 on 15q11.2, in a 3(1/2)-year-old boy, who was referred to us with a clinical suspicion of having Angelman syndrome and presenting with mental retardation, neurological disorder, developmental delay and speech impairment. Karyotype and FISH results were found to be normal. The microdeletion between BP1 and BP2 includes four genes - NIPA1, NIPA2, CYFIP1 and TUBGCP5 which was detected by a high-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH that was further validated by a Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay. The same deletion was observed in the father who presented with similar but relatively milder clinical features as compared to the affected son. Methylation studies by methylation-specific MLPA (MS-MLPA) of the SNRPN imprinting center (IC) showed a normal imprinting pattern, both in the patient and the father. To our knowledge a microdeletion limited only to the BP1-BP2 region has not yet been reported. The familial genetic alteration together with the striking clinical presentation in this study are interesting, but from our single case study it is difficult to suggest if the deletion is causative of some of the abnorma…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
22/43 (51%) of individuals with the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent.
“The review of literature from six published reports summarized by Cafferkey et al. [18] regarding information on the inheritance of the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 microdeletion indicates that 22/43 (51%) of individuals with the microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent while 10/29 (35%) of individuals inherited their deletion from an abnorma”
From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [15]
10/29 (35%) of individuals with the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion inherited their deletion from an abnormal parent.
“The review of literature from six published reports summarized by Cafferkey et al. [18] regarding information on the inheritance of the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 microdeletion indicates that 22/43 (51%) of individuals with the microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent while 10/29 (35%) of individuals inherited their deletion from an abnorma”
From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [15]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Murthy, S. K., Nygren, A. O. H., El Shakankiry, H. M., Schouten, J. P., Al Khayat, A. I., Ridha, A., & Al Ali, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Latifa Hospital (AE)
- MRC Holland (Netherlands) (NL)
- Dubai Hospital (AE)
- Venue
- Cytogenetic and Genome Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 135-140
- ISSN
- 1424-859X (ISSN-L)
- 1424-8581
- OpenAlex
- W1972357429
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cytogenetic and Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- chromosome 15q11-q13, NIPA1, CYFIP1, Angelman syndrome, developmental delay, intellectual disability, speech disorders, neurological disorders, genomic imprinting, methylation analysis
- MeSH terms
- Child, Preschool, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Nervous System Diseases, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Oligonucleotides, Pedigree, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Speech Disorders, Angelman Syndrome, Gene Deletion, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Genomic Imprinting, DNA Methylation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review