The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rationale, Design and Baseline Data of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Antithrombotic Regimens (a Fixed-Dose Combination of Extended-Release Dipyridamole plus ASA with Clopidogrel) and Telmisartan versus Placebo in Patients with Strokes: The Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS)
Open accessAbstract
Background: Individuals with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke have a high risk of recurrent stroke and death. While acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is proven and accepted as standard therapy in these patients, recent trials demonstrate that a combination of ASA and dipyridamole (DP) or clopidogrel may be superior to ASA. Blocking the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers may also reduce recurrent stroke. The ongoing PRoFESS (Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes) trial is designed to evaluate whether ASA + extended-release DP compared to clopidogrel, and whether telmisartan in addition to usual care in individuals after a stroke, will reduce the risk of further strokes. Methods: PRoFESS is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial involving 695 sites from 35 countries or regions. Patients ≧50 years presenting with an ischemic stroke <120 days who were stable were randomized. The primary outcome for the trial is recurrent stroke, using a time-to-event analysis. The most important secondary outcome is the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death. Other secondary outcomes include this composite + congestive heart failure, new-onset diabetes, other designated occlusive vascular events (pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, peripheral arterial occlusion, transient ischemic attack, cerebral venous thrombosis or retinal vascular accident not classified as stroke), any death, stroke subtype by TOAST criteria and Mini Mental State Examination score. Safety is evaluated by assessing the risk of major hemorrhagic events. The comparison between ASA + DP and clopidogrel is based on an initial assessment of noninferiority, followed by evaluation of superiority, while for telmisartan, we will assess its superiority over placebo. Results: With over 20,000 patients randomized, and utilizing a 2 × 2 factorial design, PRoFESS is the largest stroke trial to investigate the prevention of recurrent stroke. The mean age was 66.1 ± 8.6 years, and 36.0% of the patients were females. The median time from qualifying event to randomization was 15 days with 39.9% of patients randomized within 10 days. According to the TOAST criteria, 28.5% of the strokes were due to large-vessel disease, 52.1% to small-vessel disease, 1.8% to cardioembolism, and 2.0% to other determined etiologies and 15.5% were of undetermined etiology. Conclusions: PRoFESS is the largest secondary stroke prevention trial to date and will directly compare two antiplatelet regimens as well as the benefit of telmisartan versus placebo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
(1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09457-3 · Cited by 6,503
Cited by
Zhang, Q., Wang, C., Zheng, M., Li, Y., Li, J., Zhang, L., Shang, X., & Yan, C. (2015) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000369778 · Cited by 11,533
Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0801317 · Cited by 3,502
Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
Sacco, R. L., Diener, H.-C., Yusuf, S., Cotton, D., Ôunpuu, S., Lawton, W. A., Palesch, Y., Martin, R. H., Albers, G. W., Bath, P., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0805002 · Cited by 961
Self-citationTelmisartan to Prevent Recurrent Stroke and Cardiovascular Events
Yusuf, S., Diener, H.-C., Sacco, R. L., Cotton, D., Ôunpuu, S., Lawton, W. A., Palesch, Y., Martin, R. H., Albers, G. W., Bath, P., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0804593 · Cited by 785
Self-citationKennedy, J., Hill, M. D., Ryckborst, K. J., Eliasziw, M., Demchuk, A. M., & Buchan, A. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70250-8 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Diener, H.-C., Sacco, R., & Yusuf, S.
- Venue
- Cerebrovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 368-380
- ISSN
- 1015-9770 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9786
- OpenAlex
- W1987826243
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationale, Design and Baseline Data of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Antithrombotic Regimens (a Fixed-Dose Combination of Extended-Release Dipyridamole plus ASA with Clopidogrel) and Telmisartan versus Placebo in Patients with Strokes: The Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000100105
- The paper
- Diener, H.-C., Sacco, R., & Yusuf, S. (2007). Rationale, Design and Baseline Data of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Antithrombotic Regimens (a Fixed-Dose Combination of Extended-Release Dipyridamole plus ASA with Clopidogrel) and Telmisartan versus Placebo in Patients with Strokes: The Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS). Cerebrovascular Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1159/000100105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.