Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decreased Expression of the Two D2 Dopamine Receptor Isoforms in Bromocriptine-Resistant Prolactinomas

Caccavelli, Laure, Feron, Francois, Morange, Isabelle, Rouer, Evelyne, Benarous, Richard, Dewailly, Didier, Jaquet, Phillipe, Kordon, Claude, Enjalbert, Alain·1994·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Bromocriptine or other dopamine agonists are usually effective for the treatment of prolactin-secreting adenomas. Five to 18% of prolactinomas, however, do not respond to such therapy. We have shown previously that such resistance to bromocriptine correlates with reduced binding to the D2 receptor subtype of dopamine, the major PRL inhibiting factor. In the present work, we demonstrated that reduced binding actually corresponds to decreased expression of the gene coding for the D2 receptor in the pituitary from bromocriptine-resistant patients, as shown by 4-fold lower levels of the corresponding mRNAs compared to those coding for actin. The existence of two D2 receptor isoforms, D2S and D2L generated by alternative splicing, has been described in several tissues, including the pituitary. Both are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase and inhibit prolactin secretion, but, in addition, the shortest one (D2S) is more efficiently coupled to phospholipase C. Consequently, we also investigated whether expression of a particular D2 receptor isoform was preferentially affected in resistant adenomas. The proportion of messengers corresponding to the short receptor isoform (D2S) was lower in resistant compared to responsive adenomas: D2S/D2L = 0.74 +/- 0.08 and 1.00 +/- 0.07, respectively. In parallel, much lower levels of D2 receptor mRNAs were found in growth hormone-secreting adenomas, with a D2S/D2L ratio comparable to those of both normal human pituitary and bromocriptine-sensitive prolactinomas (1.05 +/- 0.11). Thus, resistance to bromocriptine therapy seems to involve defects in D2 dopamine receptor expression and possibly in posttranscriptional splicing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000126764

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Caccavelli, L., Feron, F., Morange, I., Rouer, E., Benarous, R., Dewailly, D., Jaquet, P., Kordon, C., & Enjalbert, A.
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1994
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W1974190969
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased Expression of the Two D2 Dopamine Receptor Isoforms in Bromocriptine-Resistant Prolactinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000126764
The paper
Caccavelli, L., Feron, F., Morange, I., Rouer, E., Benarous, R., Dewailly, D., Jaquet, P., Kordon, C., & Enjalbert, A. (1994). Decreased Expression of the Two D2 Dopamine Receptor Isoforms in Bromocriptine-Resistant Prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000126764

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.