The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating the Age of Mutant Disease Alleles Based on Linkage Disequilibrium
Abstract
With more and more disease genes being mapped and/or cloned, there is a growing interest in dating the age of underlying mutations. The knowledge of the age of mutation is important to finely map disease genes by linkage disequilibrium mapping. It would also help us understand the origin, evolution, and dispersion of the mutant disease genes. Despite increasing interests in dating disease mutations, the development of appropriate statistical methods is largely fragmentary, and there is a lack of systematic treatment of the topic. We propose two classes of methods for estimating the age of mutant allele at the disease locus based on linked marker data. Our methods can not handle only single-locus marker data, but also multi-locus marker data as well. Moreover, our methods can be used even when the location of the disease locus is unknown, and/or when there are mutations at the marker or disease locus. We show that some previous results are special cases of our methods. We also derive a recursive equation previously obtained by Serre et al. [Hum Genet 1990;84:449-454] and provide an explicit solution to the equation. To illustrate our methods, we applied them to two groups of data sets, one is cystic fibrosis data collected from several European populations, and the other is data on several genetic diseases (diastrophic dysplasia, progressive myoclonus epilepsy, congenital chloride diarrhea, and Batten disease) all collected from the Finnish population. The former data set allows us to trace the origin and dispersion of the most common mutation for cystic fibrosis. The latter provides an opportunity to examine whether all mutations for these diseases have the same age.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Various statistical methods have been developed that provide more realistic confidence intervals of estimated ages103–106.”
From Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. (2008) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cited by
Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2361 · Cited by 1,614
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, S.-W., & Xiong, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Human Heredity
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 315-337
- ISSN
- 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0062
- OpenAlex
- W2069494839
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (7r29gm052205-06, 5r01gm056515-05)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM56515, R29 GM52205)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- mutation age estimation, association mapping, cystic fibrosis, diastrophic dysplasia, progressive myoclonic epilepsy, congenital chloride diarrhea, Batten disease, Finnish population
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Chromosome Mapping, Cystic Fibrosis, Diarrhea, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Genetic Markers, Humans, Mutation, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Osteochondrodysplasias, Selection, Genetic, Linkage Disequilibrium, Likelihood Functions, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review