Cited by 30Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimating the Age of Mutant Disease Alleles Based on Linkage Disequilibrium

Guo, Sun-Wei, Xiong, Momiao·1997·Human Heredity

Abstract

With more and more disease genes being mapped and/or cloned, there is a growing interest in dating the age of underlying mutations. The knowledge of the age of mutation is important to finely map disease genes by linkage disequilibrium mapping. It would also help us understand the origin, evolution, and dispersion of the mutant disease genes. Despite increasing interests in dating disease mutations, the development of appropriate statistical methods is largely fragmentary, and there is a lack of systematic treatment of the topic. We propose two classes of methods for estimating the age of mutant allele at the disease locus based on linked marker data. Our methods can not handle only single-locus marker data, but also multi-locus marker data as well. Moreover, our methods can be used even when the location of the disease locus is unknown, and/or when there are mutations at the marker or disease locus. We show that some previous results are special cases of our methods. We also derive a recursive equation previously obtained by Serre et al. [Hum Genet 1990;84:449-454] and provide an explicit solution to the equation. To illustrate our methods, we applied them to two groups of data sets, one is cystic fibrosis data collected from several European populations, and the other is data on several genetic diseases (diastrophic dysplasia, progressive myoclonus epilepsy, congenital chloride diarrhea, and Batten disease) all collected from the Finnish population. The former data set allows us to trace the origin and dispersion of the most common mutation for cystic fibrosis. The latter provides an opportunity to examine whether all mutations for these diseases have the same age.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000154431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Guo, S.-W., & Xiong, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Human Heredity
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1997
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
315-337
ISSN
  • 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0062
OpenAlex
W2069494839
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r29gm052205-06, 5r01gm056515-05)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM56515, R29 GM52205)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
mutation age estimation, association mapping, cystic fibrosis, diastrophic dysplasia, progressive myoclonic epilepsy, congenital chloride diarrhea, Batten disease, Finnish population
MeSH terms
Alleles, Chromosome Mapping, Cystic Fibrosis, Diarrhea, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Genetic Markers, Humans, Mutation, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Osteochondrodysplasias, Selection, Genetic, Linkage Disequilibrium, Likelihood Functions, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review