The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comments on the Taxonomy of Brazilian Marmosets (Callithrix, Callitrichidae)
Abstract
The taxonomic appraisal of Brazilian marmosets, genus Callithrix, by Coimbra-Filho and Mittermeier is critically examined. It is shown that their assertions are not supported by the evidence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hershkovitz originally described facial characteristics of C. penicillata × Callithrix spp. hybrids from a limited number of museum specimens, and other studies have provided similar descriptions for wild hybrid samples.
“Hershkovitz (1975, 1977) originally described facial characteristics of C. penicillata 9 Callithrix spp. hybrids from a limited number of museum specimens, and other studies have provided similar descriptions for wild hybrid samples (Passamani et al. 1997; Mendes 1997a, b; RuizMiranda et al. 2006; Malukiewicz 2013).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Hershkovitz 1975
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fuzessy, L. F., Silva, I. D. O., Malukiewicz, J., Silva, F. F. R., Pônzio, M. D. C., Boere, V., & Ackermann, R. R. (2014) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9284-5 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Hershkovitz, P.
- Venue
- Folia Primatologica
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 137-172
- ISSN
- 1421-9980
- 0015-5713
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
