CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mating Patterns in the Golden Lion Tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia): Continuous Receptivity and Concealed Estrus

Stribley, Judy A., French, Jeffrey A., Inglett, Betty J.·1987·Folia Primatologica
DOI 10.1159/000156318
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sociosexual behavior was monitored on a daily basis for 3 months in 5 pairs of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). Urine samples were collected daily from each female and urinary estrogen cycles were determined by radioimmunoassay. Mounts and copulations were observed during all phases of the estrogen cycle. Peaks or regular cycles in sexual behavior were not documented. There were no significant changes in affiliative behavior by females or males that were associated with changes in urinary estrogen values. A negative relationship between pair bond duration and frequency of sexual interactions was observed: newly established pairs exhibited 2–6 times more frequent sexual behavior than a long-established pair. The lack of a conspicuous sexual signal in female golden lion tamarins may be related to a pattern of continuous sexual receptivity. Both reproductive patterns, concealed estrus and continuous receptivity, are explicable in relation to either monogamous or polyandrous mating systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000156318

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stribley, J. A., French, J. A., & Inglett, B. J.
Venue
Folia Primatologica
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
1987-02-14
Volume
49
Issue
3-4
Pages
137-150
ISSN
  • 0015-5713
  • 1421-9980
DOI
10.1159/000156318
Cited by
16
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review