Cited by 36Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Long-term survival and prognostic indicators in small (≤2 cm) pancreatic cancer

Open access
Pongprasobchai, Supot, Pannala, Rahul, Smyrk, Thomas C., Bamlet, William, Pitchumoni, Suresh, Ougolkov, Andrei, Andrade, Mariza de, Petersen, Gloria M. +1 more·2008·Pancreatology

Abstract

Objectives In a matched analysis, we investigated clinical, histopathological, and survival characteristics of small (<or=2 cm) pancreatic cancer (PaC) as compared to large PaC. Methods From the Mayo pathology database, we identified 41 consecutive patients with small PaC and 94 matched controls with margin-negative PaC >2 cm. Two experienced pathologists, who were blinded to survival data, independently reviewed tumor stage and differentiation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were applied for data analyses. Results In patients with localized disease (stages I and II), survival was similar in small and large PaC but survival was significantly better in small PaC with regional nodal metastasis (stage III) as compared to similar stage large PaC (5-year survival 44 vs. 7%, median survival 58 vs.18 months, p < 0.001). Well-differentiated small and large PaC had similar median survival (76 vs. 74 months, p = NS). In multivariate analysis, tumor differentiation, not tumor size, was the only independent factor predicting survival in PaC (risk ratio, RR, for moderate vs. well- differentiated: 2.6, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.5-4.5, and RR for poorly differentiated vs. well-differentiated: 5.0, 95% CI 2.4-10.1). Conclusion Tumor differentiation may be a better predictor of survival in resectable PaC than tumor stage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000161009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over time, the proportion of patients with very early-stage PDAC (stages IA and IB) has increased and the survival of these patients has improved, such that the 5-year survival for stage IA is in excess of 80%.

    “In fact, over time, the proportion of patients with very early-stage PDAC (stages IA and IB) has increased and the survival of these patients has improved,15 such that the 5-year survival for stage IA (node-negative PDAC measuring <2 cm) is in excess of 80%.16”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    Citation 16 is attached to the claim that five-year survival for stage IA PDAC exceeds 80%; the preceding claim about change over time has a different citation. The Results report 41% five-year survival for all small pancreatic cancers and say survival did not differ significantly among stages I, II, and III, but give no stage IA survival rate. Searches for “stage IA,” “80%,” and stage-specific five-year survival did not establish the cited figure. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]UICC-TNM classification of malignant tumors 2002 Wiley-Liss
  2. [3]Geer RJ Brennan MF Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 1993 165 68 72 8380315
  3. [4]Nitecki SS Sarr MG Colby TV van Heerden JA Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving? Ann Surg 1995 221 59 66 7826162 PMC1234495
  4. [5]Yeo CJ Cameron JL Lillemoe KD Sitzmann JV Hruban RH Goodman SN Dooley WC Coleman J Pitt HA Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995 221 721 31 discussion 731-3 7794076 PMC1234702
  5. [6]Brennan MF Moccia RD Klimstra D Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 1996 223 506 11 discussion 511-2 8651741 PMC1235171
  6. [7]Meyer W Jurowich C Reichel M Steinhauser B Wunsch PH Gebhardt C Pathomorphological and histological prognostic factors in curatively resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Today 2000 30 582 7 10930222
  7. [8]Pantalone D Ragionieri I Nesi G Improved survival in small pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 2001 18 41 6 11244258
  8. [9]Lim JECM Earle CC Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 2003 237 74 85 12496533 PMC1513971
  9. [10]Cameron JL Crist DW Sitzmann JV Hruban RH Boitnott JK Seidler AJ Coleman J Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1991 161 120 4 discussion 124-5 1987845
  10. [11]Ahmad NA Lewis JD Ginsberg GG Haller DG Morris JB Williams NN Rosato EF Kochman ML Long term survival after pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 2609 15 11569683
  11. [12]Tsuchiya R Noda T Harada N Miyamoto T Tomioka T Yamamoto K Yamaguchi T Izawa K Tsunoda T Yoshino R Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Annals of Surgery 1986 203 77 81 3942423 PMC1251042
  12. [13]Tsuchiya R Tsunoda T Tumor size as a predictive factor. Int J Pancreatol 1990 7 117 23 2081915
  13. [14]Satake K Nishiwaki H Yokomatsu H Kawazoe Y Kim K Haku A Umeyama K Miyazaki I Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992 175 259 65 1514162
  14. [15]Furukawa H Okada S Saisho H Ariyama J Karasawa E Nakaizumi A Nakazawa S Murakami K Kakizoe T Clinicopathologic features of small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A collective study. Cancer 1996 78 986 90 8780535
  15. [16]Tsunoda T Yamamoto Y Kimoto M Imai H Iwamoto S Kawasaki S Kawashima K Tadaoka Y Majima T Onuma E Iki K Kubozoe T Eto T Staging and treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. How small is an early pancreatic cancer? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998 5 128 32 9745077
  16. [18]Tumours of the exocrine pancreas 2000 IARC Press
  17. [19]Manabe T Miyashita T Ohshio G Nonaka A Suzuki T Endo K Takahashi M Tobe T Small carcinoma of the pancreas: clinical and pathologic evaluation of 17 patients. Cancer 1988 62 135 141 3164230
  18. [20]van Geenen RC van Gulik TM Offerhaus GJ de Wit LT Busch OR Obertop H Gouma DJ Survival after pancreaticoduodenetomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001 27 549 557 11520088
  19. [21]Lüttges J Schemm S Vogel I Hedderich J Kremer B Klöppel G The grade of pancreatic ductal carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor and is superior to the immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation. J Pathol 2000 191 154 61 10861575

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pongprasobchai, S., Pannala, R., Smyrk, T. C., Bamlet, W., Pitchumoni, S., Ougolkov, A., Andrade, M. D., Petersen, G. M., & Chari, S. T.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Chari, Suresh T.
Venue
Pancreatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
587-592
ISSN
1424-3903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117802350
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pancreatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P50 CA 10270, P50CA102701, R01CA100685)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, small pancreatic tumors, tumor size, long-term survival, prognostic factors, tumor differentiation, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, resectable pancreatic cancer
MeSH terms
Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review