Cited by 31Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Changes in the Electroencephalographic Spectrum in Response to Smoking Cues in Smokers and Ex-Smokers

Open access
Littel, Marianne, Franken, Ingmar H.A., Van Strien, Jan W.·2009·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the changes in the electroencephalographic (EEG) spectrum in smokers during exposure to a neutral and a smoking-related cue to determine whether these EEG changes are still present in ex-smokers after prolonged abstinence and to examine the relationship between the power in each spectral bandwidth and subjective craving. Methods: EEG frequencies in response to a smoking-related and a neutral cue were examined in 23 smokers and 21 ex-smokers, who quit smoking for 1.4 years on average. Additionally, self-report measures of cigarette craving and nicotine dependence were obtained. The spectral power of each bandwidth was computed, log-transformed, and analyzed using a within-subject design. Differences between EEG activity under neutral and smoking conditions were correlated with differences between pre- and postexperimental subjective craving. Results: Increases in reward craving (desire and intention to smoke) were associated with reduced theta activity, whereas increases in withdrawal craving (reduction of negative affect and withdrawal symptoms) were correlated with increases in both delta and higher alpha power. Furthermore, in smokers, but not in ex-smokers, a significant beta power increase was observed between the neutral condition and the smoking condition. Conclusion: Since the beta band is associated with arousal, attention, and alertness, it is suggested that the beta increase in response to the smoking cue might reflect an enhanced allocation of resources to smoking-related stimuli, i.e. a processing bias, which is an important feature of substance abuse. Since ex-smokers do not respond to the smoking cue with beta activity enhancement, we preliminarily conclude that smoking cues do not arouse ex-smokers or capture their attention as much as they do in smokers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000205517

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Church R: Smoking and the human EEG; in Ney T, Gale A (eds): Smoking and Human Behavior. Chichester, Wiley Sons, 1989, pp 115-140.
  2. Ulett JA, Itil TM: Quantitative electroen- cephalogram in smoking and smoking de- privation. Science 1969; 164: 969-970.
  3. Franken IH: Drug craving and addiction: in- tegrating psychological and neuropsycho- pharmacological approaches. Prog Neuro- psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003; 27: 563-579.
  4. Robinson TE, Berridge KC: Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54: 25-53.
  5. Hudmon KS, Pomerleau CS, Brigham J, Ja- vitz H, Swan GE: Validity of retrospective as- sessments of nicotine dependence: a prelim- inary report. Addict Behav 2005; 30: 613- 617.
  6. ACNS: American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 5: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 23: 107-110.
  7. Dien J, Santuzzi AM: Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high-density ERP data- sets: a review and tutorial; in Handy TC (ed): Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Hand- book. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2005, pp 57- 82.
  8. Niedermeyer E: The normal EEG of the wak- ing adult; in Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Sil- va F (eds): Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Relat- ed Fields. Baltimore, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999, vol 4, pp 149-173.
  9. Liu X, Vaupel DB, Grant S, London ED: Ef- fect of cocaine-related environmental stim- uli on the spontaneous electroencephalo- gram in polydrug abusers. Neuropsycho- pharmacology 1998; 19: 10-17.

Authors
Littel, M., Franken, I. H. A., & Van Strien, J. W.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
43-50
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2080687553
Cited by
31
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking cues, former smokers, nicotine dependence, cigarette craving, beta activity, theta activity, attentional bias, smoking cessation, cue reactivity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain, Cues, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review