Prevalence and Risk Factors for Overlaps between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Dyspepsia, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Population-Based Study
Abstract
Background/aims People may have symptoms of multiple disorders at the same time. We aimed to determine prevalence and risk factors for overlaps between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a Korean population. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed on 1,688 randomly selected Korean subjects. Data on 1,443 subjects could be analyzed. Dyspepsia and IBS were diagnosed using modified Rome II criteria. Results The prevalences of GERD, dyspepsia and IBS were 8.5, 9.5 and 9.6%. Overlaps between GERD and dyspepsia, GERD and IBS, and dyspepsia and IBS were observed in 2.3 (95% CI 1.4-3.0), 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-2.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.6-1.8%) of the population. 27 and 24% of GERD subjects suffered from dyspepsia and IBS. 24 and 14% of dyspeptic subjects had GERD and IBS. 21 and 14% of IBS subjects had GERD and dyspepsia. Anxiety was significantly associated with GERD overlap (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.13-6.57), dyspepsia overlap (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.33-7.63) and IBS overlap (OR 4.92, 95% CI 2.04-11.84), compared with GERD alone, dyspepsia alone and IBS alone. Conclusions Overlaps between GERD, dyspepsia, and IBS are common in the general population. These overlaps occur predominantly in individuals with anxiety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twenty one percent of IBS patients also had GERD symptoms.
“Twenty one percent of IBS patients also had GERD symptoms.”
From Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Co-morbid Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Functional Syndromes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
Patients with symptom overlap demonstrated high levels of anxiety compared with patients with only 1 FGID.
“Patients with symptom overlap demonstrated high levels of anxiety compared with patients with only 1 FGID.19”
From Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Co-morbid Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Functional Syndromes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Lee, S. Y., Lee, K. J., Kim, S. J., & Cho, S. W.
- Affiliations
- General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
- Ajou University (KR)
- Venue
- Digestion
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 196-201
- ISSN
- 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9867
- OpenAlex
- W2039966124
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 19.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digestion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
- Keywords
- gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, comorbidities, symptom overlap, prevalence, risk factors, anxiety, Korean population
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyspepsia, Female, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review