Cited by 177Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Overlaps between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Dyspepsia, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Population-Based Study

Lee, Soon Young, Lee, Kwang Jae, Kim, Soo Jeong, Cho, Sung Won·2009·Digestion

Abstract

Background/aims People may have symptoms of multiple disorders at the same time. We aimed to determine prevalence and risk factors for overlaps between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a Korean population. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed on 1,688 randomly selected Korean subjects. Data on 1,443 subjects could be analyzed. Dyspepsia and IBS were diagnosed using modified Rome II criteria. Results The prevalences of GERD, dyspepsia and IBS were 8.5, 9.5 and 9.6%. Overlaps between GERD and dyspepsia, GERD and IBS, and dyspepsia and IBS were observed in 2.3 (95% CI 1.4-3.0), 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-2.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.6-1.8%) of the population. 27 and 24% of GERD subjects suffered from dyspepsia and IBS. 24 and 14% of dyspeptic subjects had GERD and IBS. 21 and 14% of IBS subjects had GERD and dyspepsia. Anxiety was significantly associated with GERD overlap (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.13-6.57), dyspepsia overlap (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.33-7.63) and IBS overlap (OR 4.92, 95% CI 2.04-11.84), compared with GERD alone, dyspepsia alone and IBS alone. Conclusions Overlaps between GERD, dyspepsia, and IBS are common in the general population. These overlaps occur predominantly in individuals with anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000211715

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 177

Authors
Lee, S. Y., Lee, K. J., Kim, S. J., & Cho, S. W.
Affiliations
  • General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Venue
Digestion
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
196-201
ISSN
  • 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9867
OpenAlex
W2039966124
Cited by
177
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Keywords
gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, comorbidities, symptom overlap, prevalence, risk factors, anxiety, Korean population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyspepsia, Female, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review