Cited by 103Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Stability of Different Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment among the Elderly over a 2- to 3-Year Follow-Up Period

Open access
Loewenstein, David A., Acevedo, Amarilis, Small, Brent J., Agron, Joscelyn, Crocco, Elizabeth, Duara, Ranjan·2009·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Background/Aims: To investigate the longitudinal stability and progression of different subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults. Methods: We classified 217 individuals with no cognitive impairment (NCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI) based on a single test (aMCI-1) or multiple tests (aMCI-2+), nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) based on a single test (naMCI-1) or multiple tests (naMCI-2+), or amnestic + nonamnestic MCI (a+naMCI), using their baseline neuropsychological test scores, and performed annual follow-up evaluations for up to 3 years. Results: None of the subjects with aMCI-2+ reverted to normal during follow-up, with 50% of these subjects remaining stable and 50% worsening over time. Similarly, less than 20% of subjects with aMCI-2+ and a+naMCI reverted to NCI during the follow-up period, whereas 50% of aMCI-1 and 37% with naMCI-1 reverted to NCI during this same period. Conclusion: Reversion to NCI occurs much more frequently when the diagnosis of MCI is based on the results of a single neuropsychological test than when it is based on the results of more memory tests. In epidemiological studies and clinical trials the diagnosis of MCI will likely be more stable if impairment on more than one test is required for amnestic and/or nonamnestic domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000211803

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Small, B. J., Agron, J., Crocco, E., & Duara, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
418-423
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2079338106
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG020094, P50AG025711)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, amnestic MCI, non-amnestic MCI, MCI subtypes, longitudinal stability, cognitive decline, diagnostic criteria, older adults, dementia risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Language, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Socioeconomic Factors, Space Perception, Wechsler Scales, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review