Stability of Different Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment among the Elderly over a 2- to 3-Year Follow-Up Period
Open accessAbstract
Background/Aims: To investigate the longitudinal stability and progression of different subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults. Methods: We classified 217 individuals with no cognitive impairment (NCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI) based on a single test (aMCI-1) or multiple tests (aMCI-2+), nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) based on a single test (naMCI-1) or multiple tests (naMCI-2+), or amnestic + nonamnestic MCI (a+naMCI), using their baseline neuropsychological test scores, and performed annual follow-up evaluations for up to 3 years. Results: None of the subjects with aMCI-2+ reverted to normal during follow-up, with 50% of these subjects remaining stable and 50% worsening over time. Similarly, less than 20% of subjects with aMCI-2+ and a+naMCI reverted to NCI during the follow-up period, whereas 50% of aMCI-1 and 37% with naMCI-1 reverted to NCI during this same period. Conclusion: Reversion to NCI occurs much more frequently when the diagnosis of MCI is based on the results of a single neuropsychological test than when it is based on the results of more memory tests. In epidemiological studies and clinical trials the diagnosis of MCI will likely be more stable if impairment on more than one test is required for amnestic and/or nonamnestic domains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of objective tests of other cognitive domains reduces the ability to detect cognitive impairment profiles that might identify distinct subtypes of MCI that vary in clinical and biological characteristics.
“Finally, the lack of objective tests of other cognitive domains reduces the ability to detect cognitive impairment profiles that might identify distinct subtypes of MCI that vary in clinical and biological characteristics [19–21].”
From Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bondi, M. W., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Edmonds, E. C., Jak, A. J., Clark, L. R., Delano-Wood, L., McDonald, C. R., Nation, D. A., Libon, D. J., Au, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-140276 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Canevelli, M., Grande, G., Lacorte, E., Quarchioni, E., Cesari, M., Mariani, C., Bruno, G., & Vanacore, N. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.06.020 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Sachdev, P. S., Lipnicki, D. M., Crawford, J., Reppermund, S., Kochan, N. A., Trollor, J. N., Wen, W., Draper, B., Slavin, M. J., Kang, K., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059649 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
- Authors
- Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Small, B. J., Agron, J., Crocco, E., & Duara, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-423
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- PMC
- PMC2814021
- OpenAlex
- W2079338106
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG020094, P50AG025711)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, amnestic MCI, non-amnestic MCI, MCI subtypes, longitudinal stability, cognitive decline, diagnostic criteria, older adults, dementia risk
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Language, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Socioeconomic Factors, Space Perception, Wechsler Scales, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review