The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hypersensitivity Responses to Bee Venom and to Mellitin
Abstract
Bee venom has both antigenic and anaphylactoid properties. Immunization of mice with relatively small amounts of this venom induced both cutaneous and fatal systemic hypersensitivity to appropriate challenge with this material. Equivalent or greater systemic hypersensitivity was also induced by adrenalectomy or by heat stress, and thus a fatal reaction to this venom does not necessarily reflect an allergic condition. All immune and anaphylactoid responses to bee venom were reproduced with mellitin, a cationic polypeptide constituent of this venom. In contrast, enhanced response to phospholipase A was demonstrated only by systemic challenge of venom-immunized mice. The results suggest that mellitin is an important allergen as well as the major toxic constituent of whole bee venom.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such envenomation not only provokes an innate inflammatory response and pathology related to the biological activities of the venoms’ toxins [86–88], but also can induce allergic sensitization associated with the development of specific IgE antibodies [89–94].”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mast cells and IgE in defense against venoms: Possible “good side” of allergy?
Galli, S. J., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2016) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2015.09.002 · Cited by 73
Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy
Galli, S. J., Metz, M., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2020) · Allergo Journal International · doi:10.1007/s40629-020-00118-6 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Saelinger, C. B., & Higginbotham, R. D.
- Venue
- International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009-07-23
- Pages
- 28-37
- ISSN
- 0020-5915
- 2571-6662
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review