CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Dermatological diseases and infestationsDermatology and Skin DiseasesNail Diseases and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Epidemiological Survey of Skin Diseases in Schoolchildren Living in the Purus Valley (Acre State, Amazonia, Brazil)

Bechelli, Luiz M., Haddad, Nagib, Pimenta, Waiter P., Pagnano, Paulo M.G., Melchior, Jr, E., Fregnan, Roberto C., Zanin, Luiz C., Arenas, Ademir·2009·Dermatologica
DOI 10.1159/000250144
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A total of 9,955 schoolchildren aged 6–16 years have been examined in a tropical region. The prevalence of dermatosis varied from 21 to 87% in the municipalities surveyed. The most common dermatoses were pediculosis (prevalence 50%), nevi (16.8%), pityriasis versicolor (13.2%), pyoderma (12.2%), pityriasis alba (9.9%), dermatophytosis (6.2%), viral dermatosis (6.2%), scabies (3.0%) and acne vulgaris (2.7%). The prevalence of angular stomatitis, miliaria rubra, candidiasis, piedra nigra, keratosis pilaris, ephelides and geographic tongue is lower but still relatively high. Females had higher rates of pediculosis capitís and males higher prevalence of pityriasis alba. The prevalence of pityriasis versicolor, pigmented nevus and scabies was similar in males and females. Folliculitis, macular pigmented nevi and especially pityriasis versicolor tended to increase with age. Leprosy is hyperendemic in the surveyed area and its rate in the schoolchildren examined was 0.08%. Population movement (urbanization), socioeconomic situation, living conditions, promiscuity, and lack of hygiene may be the cause of such high prevalence and of association of two or more skin conditions. Climatic conditions might have enhanced the prevalence of certain dermatoses (pityriasis versicolor, dermatophytosis, piedra nigra, candidiasis, miliaria rubra).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000250144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bechelli, L. M., Haddad, N., Pimenta, W. P., Pagnano, P. M. G., Melchior, Jr., Fregnan, R. C., Zanin, L. C., & Arenas, A.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Dermatologica
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009-10-14
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
78-93
ISSN
  • 0011-9075 (ISSN-L)
  • 2571-7197
DOI
10.1159/000250144
OpenAlex
W2093644789
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Dermatologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
skin diseases, elementary school students, Acre, head lice, pityriasis versicolor, pityriasis alba, dermatophytosis, scabies, pyoderma, nevi, leprosy, sex differences, age differences, climatic factors, socioeconomic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brazil, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Rural Health, Sex Factors, Skin Diseases, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review