The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relative Rates of Progress of Artificial Carious Lesions in Bovine, Ovine and Human Enamel
Abstract
Artificial carious lesions were produced by a gelatin/lactic acid system in deciduous bovine, permanent bovine, deciduous human and permanent human enamel over periods up to 8 days, and the progress measured by dye imbibition studies. Artificial carious lesions were produced in bovine, ovine and human permanent enamel using a diphosphonate/lactic acid system over periods up to 30 days, progress was assessed by depth measurement, and overall diffusion coefficients were calculated. The rate of lesion progress was linear with the square root of time for both systems of assessment. Lesion progress as measured by dye imbibition was in the ratio 3.7: 2.9: 1.5:1.0 for bovine deciduous: bovine permanent: human deciduous: human permanent, respectively. Bovine permanent, ovine permanent and abraded bovine permanent lesions progressed at equal rates and in the ratio 3.0: 1.0 to human permanent enamel, as measured by overall diffusion coefficients. The results provide an approximate basis for the use of bovine, ovine and human artificial carious lesion data in the quantitative discussion of the caries process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride
Featherstone, J. D. B. (1999) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x · Cited by 989
Self-citationDental caries: a dynamic disease process
Featherstone, J. (2008) · Australian Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x · Cited by 507
Self-citationBovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature
Yassen, G. H., Platt, J. A., & Hara, A. T. (2011) · Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.2334/josnusd.53.273 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Featherstone, J. D. B., & Mellberg, J. R.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1981
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-114
- ISSN
- 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-976X
- OpenAlex
- W2077739955
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative Rates of Progress of Artificial Carious Lesions in Bovine, Ovine and Human Enamel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000260508
- The paper
- Featherstone, J. D. B., & Mellberg, J. R. (1981). Relative Rates of Progress of Artificial Carious Lesions in Bovine, Ovine and Human Enamel. Caries Research. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.