The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Demineralization of Human Dentine Compared with Enamel in a pH-Cycling Apparatus with a Constant Composition during De- and Remineralization Periods
Abstract
A comparison was made between the demineralization of enamel and dentine with and without abraded surfaces. This was done in a pH-cycling experiment for different demineralization/remineralization ratios – in the range from 1:1 to 1:4 – and for different fluoride additions (up to 2 ppm) in solution. A new automatic pH-cycling system, in which the de- and remineralization solutions have a constant composition during the de- and remineralization cycles, was used to create mineral loss in human dentine and enamel. Changes in mineral content were monitored by means of longitudinal microradiography. A linear correlation was found between the amount of mineral lost and the total demineralization time for both dentine and enamel. The demineralization rates were comparable for abraded enamel and dentine and for polished enamel and dentine, and this rate was roughly doubled by the removal of the outer surface for both tissues. This showed that the presence of the outer surface is equally important to dentine and enamel. Under the pH-cycling conditions used, a logarithmic relation was found between the addition of fluoride and the decrease in demineralization for both enamel and dentine. The inhibitory effect of fluoride on demineralization was most pronounced on abraded enamel, followed by pumice-polished enamel, abraded dentine and pumice-polished dentine. About 2 ppm fluoride was needed under the conditions used to stop enamel demineralization completely; in the case of dentine, however, this amount of added fluoride did not inhibit demineralization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies suggest that the anti-caries effect of fluoride on dentine is not of the same magnitude as that on enamel.
“However, the knowledge about the anti-caries effect of fluoride on dentine is scarce [6, 16], and some studies suggest that it would not be of the same magnitude as that on enamel [17, 18].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Herkströter, F. M., Witjes, M., & Arends, J.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009-11-18
- Pages
- 317-322
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review