RAGE Does Not Affect Amyloid Pathology in Transgenic ArcAβ Mice
Open accessAbstract
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by brain accumulation of the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) that triggers a cascade of biochemical and cellular alterations resulting in the clinical phenotype of the disease. While numerous experiments addressed Aβ toxicity, the mechanisms are still not fully understood. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) binds Aβ and was suggested to be involved in the pathological processes of AD. Objective: Our purpose was to assess the effect of RAGE deletion on Aβ-related pathology. Methods: We crossed RAGE knockout (RAGE–/–) mice with transgenic mice harboring both the Swedish and Arctic Aβ precursor protein mutations (arcAβ mice). We assessed Aβ levels, Aβ brain deposition, Aβ-degrading enzyme activities, Aβ precursor protein expression and processing, number and morphology of microglia as well as cognitive performance of 6- and 12-month-old RAGE–/–/arcAβ, RAGE–/–, arcAβ and wild-type mice. Results: RAGE–/–/arcAβ mice had significantly lower levels of SDS- and formic-acid-extracted Aβ in the cortex and hippocampus, with concomitantly increased activity of insulin-degrading enzyme at the age of 6 months. However, RAGE deletion could neither prevent the decline in cognitive performance nor the age-related cerebral accumulation of Aβ peptide. Furthermore, histological analysis revealed no difference in the microglia-occupied brain areas or microglial morphologies between RAGE–/–/arcAβ and arcAβ mice. Conclusions: Together, our results indicate that while the absence of RAGE was associated with increased insulin-degrading enzyme activity in the brain, it was not sufficient to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deterioration, Aβ accumulation and microglial activation in the arcAβ mouse model of AD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At twelve months, RAGE knockout did not alter cognition or microglial recruitment to plaques.
“However, no change in cognition or microglial recruitment to plaques was seen in 12-month-old mice”
From Microglia in neurodegeneration (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
At six months, RAGE−/− Aβ-mice show less Aβ deposition and more Aβ-degrading enzymes.
“Six-monthold RAGE−/− Aβ-mice have reduced Aβ deposition and more Aβ-degrading enzymes140.”
From Microglia in neurodegeneration (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kalea AZ, Reiniger N, Yang H, Arriero M, Schmidt AM, Hudson BI: Alternative splic- ing of the murine receptor for advanced gly- cation end-product (RAGE) gene. Faseb J 2009; 23: 1766-1774.
- Yamamoto M, Kiyota T, Walsh SM, Liu J, Kipnis J, Ikezu T: Cy tok ine-mediated inhibi- tion of fibrillar amyloid- peptide degrada- tion by human mononuclear phagocytes. J Immunol 2008; 181: 3877-3886.
- Authors
- Vodopivec, I., Galichet, A., Knobloch, M., Bierhaus, A., Heizmann, C. W., & Nitsch, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- ORCID
- Knobloch, Marlen
- Venue
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 270-280
- ISSN
- 1660-2854 (ISSN-L)
- 1660-2862
- OpenAlex
- W2052580143
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurodegenerative Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- receptor for advanced glycation end products, RAGE, amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, insulin-degrading enzyme, microglia, cognitive decline, amyloid-beta deposition, transgenic mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products, Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Peptide Fragments, Receptors, Immunologic, Statistics as Topic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Maze Learning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review