Cited by 77Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareOrgan Donation and Transplantation

Donors Perceptions of Consent to and Feedback from Biobank Research: Time to Acknowledge Diversity?

Hoeyer, K.·2010·Public Health Genomics

Abstract

Background: Many studies have explored public perspectives on when and how to provide informed consent to biobank research and when to get feedback on research results. Little has been done to explore overarching trends in these studies. Methods: The article is based on a critical reading of the literature found through Medline searches and the PRIVILEGED project compilation of empirical studies. Results: I suggest that tissue type, procurement situation including who is asked to provide consent, and the biobank’s geographical, social and historical context influence how various potential donors view the issues of consent, re-consent, and feedback of research results. In light of this, universal ethical standards for informed consent to and feedback of research results from biobank research seem to run contrary to the diversity of perceptions and expectations among different donors. Conclusion: To respect donor interests, it is necessary to pay more attention to diversity with regard to biobank types and different contexts for donation. We should avoid assuming that words like ‘biobank’ and ‘donor’ can be used in a generic sense – always referring to the same – if we wish to respect and care for the diverse group of individuals who comprise the donating public.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000262329

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Actual practice of informed consent for biospecimen research varies, as collections of biospecimens (or biobanks) are highly heterogeneous in terms of tissue type, procurement situation, and geographic, social, and historical context.

    “Actual practice varies, as collections of biospecimens (or biobanks) are highly heterogeneous in terms of tissue type, procurement situation, and geographic, social, and historical context (56, 58,60, 126, 146).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoeyer, K.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Hoeyer, K.
Venue
Public Health Genomics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009-11-26
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
345-352
ISSN
  • 1422-2795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4246
  • 1662-8063
OpenAlex
W2012949888
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
Keywords
biobanks, informed consent, donor perceptions, re-consent, tissue type, moral norms
MeSH terms
Feedback, Humans, Tissue Banks, Tissue Donors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review