The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corticospinal Tract Change in the Unaffected Hemisphere at the Early Stage of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study
Abstract
Objectives: Contribution by the unaffected hemisphere is one of the motor recovery mechanisms following stroke. We attempted to investigate changes in the corticospinal tract (CST) in the unaffected hemisphere at the early stage in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), using diffusion tensor tractography (DTT). Subjects and Methods: Fifty-three consecutive hemiparetic patients and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects were enrolled. DTT was performed using a 1.5-tesla system at the early stage of ICH (7–28 days after onset). We measured the fiber number, fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient of CST tractography in the unaffected hemisphere, and assessed the motor function of the affected extremities. Results: The fiber number of the CST in the unaffected hemisphere of the patient group was higher than that of the control group (p = 0.000). In contrast, the fractional anisotropy value was lower than that of the control group (p = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient values between the 2 groups (p = 0.654). Conclusions: We demonstrated that the CST in the unaffected hemisphere was changed at the early stage in patients with ICH, using DTT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The tract number is determined by the number of voxels contained within a neural tract (Kwak et al., 2010).”
From The Ascending Reticular Activating System from Pontine Reticular Formation to the Thalamus in the Human Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Kwak et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1053%2Fapmr.2001.25101 · DOI
- 10.1093%2Fbrain%2F120.9.1579 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0924-980X%2896%2995560-5 · DOI
- 10.1006%2Fjmrb.1996.0086 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002%2F1531-8249%28199902%2945%3A2%3C265%3A%3AAID-ANA21%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000115178 · DOI
- 10.3171%2Fjns.2003.98.1.0064 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00002060-200211000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1148%2Frg.251045085 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.neulet.2008.12.033 · DOI
- 10.1148%2Fradiol.2301021640 · DOI
- 10.1148%2Fradiol.2423060297 · DOI
- 10.2463%2Fmrms.3.11 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006%2Fnimg.2002.1055 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.2009.04587.x · DOI
- 10.1080%2F02841850701561372 · DOI
- 10.1007%2Fs00330-007-0733-8 · DOI
- 10.1148%2Fradiol.2471070707 · DOI
- 10.1093%2Fcercor%2Fbhj045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2Fj.nurt.2007.05.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161%2F01.STR.31.3.656 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00001756-200307180-00004 · DOI
- 10.1161%2Fhs1101.097401 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2005.06.033 · DOI
- 10.1002%2F1097-4598%28200011%2923%3A11%3C1761%3A%3AAID-MUS14%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS1388-2457%2802%2900062-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeo, S. S., Chang, P. H., & Jang, S. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00416 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwak, S. Y., Yeo, S. S., Choi, B. Y., Chang, C. H., & Jang, S. H.
- Venue
- European Neurology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149-153
- ISSN
- 0014-3022
- 1421-9913
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticospinal Tract Change in the Unaffected Hemisphere at the Early Stage of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000281108
- The paper
- Kwak, S. Y., Yeo, S. S., Choi, B. Y., Chang, C. H., & Jang, S. H. (2010). Corticospinal Tract Change in the Unaffected Hemisphere at the Early Stage of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study. European Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000281108