The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conceptual Obstacles to Research Progress in Affective Disorders
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, a largely untested assumption (what makes the patients feel better is the best for keeping him/her well) has hindered the progress of pharmacological research in depression, with neglect of drugs that may be effective for maintenance treatment and not for the treatment of the acute episode.82”
From May antidepressant drugs worsen the conditions they are supposed to treat? The clinical foundations of the oppositional model of tolerance (2020) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevention of Recurrent Depression With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Preliminary Findings
Fava, G. A., Rafanelli, C., Grandi, S., Conti, S., & Belluardo, P. (1998) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.9.816 · Cited by 491
“If the effectiveness of this approach is established, the result might have important implications for the clinician and for current conceptualizations of affective disorders.(50)”
BackgroundSelf-citationFunctioning and Disability in Bipolar Disorder: An Extensive Review
Sánchez‐Moreno, J., Martínez‐Arán, A., Tabarés‐Seisdedos, R., Torrent, C., Vieta, E., & Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000228249 · Cited by 467
“found that all of these measures related to quality of life, disability and overall functioning evaluated the same areas of life, e.g. social, occupational and vocational life. Although each of them seemed to be sensitive to different aspects of life, subthreshold depression was the strongest common factor that influe…”
BackgroundFava, G. A., & Ruini, C. (2003) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(03)00019-3 · Cited by 386
“This was because therapeutic efforts were aimed only at the acute phase of psychiatric disorders and subclinical symptomatology was viewed as devoid of substantial clinical interest (Fava, 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWell-being therapy: Conceptual and technical issues
Fava, G. A. (1999) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000012329 · Cited by 311
“remark – historically mental health research is dramatically weighted on the side of psychological dysfunction and health is equated with the absence of illness rather than the presence of wellness. In a naive conceptualization, yet the one implicitly endorsed by the DSM, well-being and distress may be seen as mutuall…”
BackgroundSelf-citationCognitive Dysfunctions in Bipolar Disorder: Evidence of Neuropsychological Disturbances
Martínez‐Arán, A., Vieta, E., Colom, F., Reinares, M., Benabarre, A., Gastó, C., & Salamero, M. (1999) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000012361 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Fava, G. A.
- Corresponding author
- Fava, Giovanni A.
- ORCID
- Fava, Giovanni A.
- Venue
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010-02-18
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 283-285
- ISSN
- 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0348
- OpenAlex
- W1969210003
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- mood disorders, conceptual difficulties, research progress, depression, bipolar disorder, conceptualization of mental disorders
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychotherapy, Research, Treatment Outcome, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
