Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In situ Remineralisation of Enamel and Dentin after the Use of an Amine Fluoride Mouthrinse in Addition to Twice Daily Brushings with Amine Fluoride Toothpaste

Laheij, A.M.G.A., van Strijp, A.J.P., van Loveren, C.·2010·Caries Research

Abstract

It is often claimed that 3 fluoride moments a day significantly reduce the caries risk compared to 2 daily fluoride moments. However, previous research is not conclusive. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect on lesion progression of 2 versus 3 fluoride moments a day. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over in situ experiment was designed. The experiment comprised 2 in situ periods of 3 weeks with a washout period of 3 weeks in between. Sixteen participants wore an enamel and a dentine specimen with a preformed lesion placed buccally in their partial prosthesis. The participants brushed twice a day with a 1,400 ppm F (amine fluoride) toothpaste and rinsed once a day with either 250 ppm F (amine F/NaF) or a placebo rinse. At the end of the experiment the specimens were retrieved for fluoride analysis and the assessment of integrated mineral loss with transversal microradiography. The fluoride analysis showed a statistically significant increase in structurally bound fluoride in dentine, but not in enamel, when comparing the fluoride mouthrinse group with the placebo rinse group. The amounts of loosely bound, KOH-soluble fluoride were not different between both groups neither for enamel nor for dentine. In dentine IML gain was significantly (p < 0.05) higher for the fluoride mouthrinse group than for the placebo mouthrinse group. In enamel no statistically significant differences in IML gain were found. For dentine a third fluoride moment may be beneficial in enhancing remineralisation, even under the remineralising conditions as in this study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000314673

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1016%2F0003-9969%2875%2990023-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1177%2F154405910708600504 · DOI
  3. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0714.1974.tb01710.x · DOI
  4. 10.1159%2F000063929 · DOI
  5. 10.1159%2F000084833 · DOI
  6. 10.1159%2F000049109 · DOI
  7. 10.1159%2F000063921 · DOI
  8. 10.1159%2F000262089 · DOI
  9. 10.1177%2F154405910808701105 · DOI
  10. 10.1159%2F000084804 · DOI
  11. 10.1177%2F154405910508400504 · DOI
  12. 10.1159%2F000262112 · DOI
  13. 10.1159%2F000075935 · DOI
  14. 10.1159%2F000262050 · DOI
  15. 10.1159%2F000016496 · DOI
  16. 10.1111%2Fj.1752-7325.1993.tb02691.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laheij, A. M. G. A., van Strijp, A. J. P., & van Loveren, C.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
260-266
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
8
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review