Abdominal adhesion prevention: Still a sticky subject
Abstract
Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Design: Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Results: Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. Conclusions: No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Barrier materials temporarily separate injured tissue surfaces during the critical early phase of wound healing, typically the first 3 to 7 days after surgery, when fibrin deposition and fibroblast proliferation drive adhesion formation.
“One promising solution to postoperative adhesion is using barrier materials that temporarily separate injured tissue surfaces during the critical early phase of wound healing, typically the first 3 to 7 days after surgery, when fibrin deposition and fibroblast proliferation drive adhesion formation [2].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.
“Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Adhesions still develop in 50-95% of patients after abdominal or pelvic operations despite advances in surgical technique.
“Despite advances in surgical technique, adhesions still develop in 50–95% of patients after abdominal or pelvic operations [1,2].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
The Role of Laparoscopy in Chronic Pelvic Pain: Promise and Pitfalls
HOWARD, F. M. (1993) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/00006254-199306000-00001 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lauder, C. I. W., Garcea, G., Strickland, A., & Maddern, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
- Venue
- Digestive Surgery
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-358
- ISSN
- 0253-4886 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9883
- OpenAlex
- W2015388299
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digestive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Keywords
- peritoneal adhesions, adhesion prevention, surgical adhesions, laparoscopic surgery, small bowel obstruction
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Humans, Peritoneum, Digestive System Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review