Cited by 89Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsHernia repair and managementEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Abdominal adhesion prevention: Still a sticky subject

Lauder, Chris I.W., Garcea, Giuseppe, Strickland, Andrew, Maddern, Guy J.·2010·Digestive Surgery

Abstract

Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Design: Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Results: Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. Conclusions: No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000314805

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barrier materials temporarily separate injured tissue surfaces during the critical early phase of wound healing, typically the first 3 to 7 days after surgery, when fibrin deposition and fibroblast proliferation drive adhesion formation.

    “One promising solution to postoperative adhesion is using barrier materials that temporarily separate injured tissue surfaces during the critical early phase of wound healing, typically the first 3 to 7 days after surgery, when fibrin deposition and fibroblast proliferation drive adhesion formation [2].”
  • Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.

    “Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.”
  • Adhesions still develop in 50-95% of patients after abdominal or pelvic operations despite advances in surgical technique.

    “Despite advances in surgical technique, adhesions still develop in 50–95% of patients after abdominal or pelvic operations [1,2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lauder, C. I. W., Garcea, G., Strickland, A., & Maddern, G. J.
Affiliations
Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
Venue
Digestive Surgery
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
347-358
ISSN
  • 0253-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9883
OpenAlex
W2015388299
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
peritoneal adhesions, adhesion prevention, surgical adhesions, laparoscopic surgery, small bowel obstruction
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Humans, Peritoneum, Digestive System Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review