Cellular Scaling Rules for the Brains of an Extended Number of Primate Species
Open accessAbstract
What are the rules relating the size of the brain and its structures to the number of cells that compose them and their average sizes? We have shown previously that the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and the remaining brain structures increase in size as a linear function of their numbers of neurons and non-neuronal cells across 6 species of primates. Here we describe that the cellular composition of the same brain structures of 5 other primate species, as well as humans, conform to the scaling rules identified previously, and that the updated power functions for the extended sample are similar to those determined earlier. Accounting for phylogenetic relatedness in the combined dataset does not affect the scaling slopes that apply to the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, but alters the slope for the remaining brain structures to a value that is similar to that observed in rodents, which raises the possibility that the neuronal scaling rules for these structures are shared among rodents and primates. The conformity of the new set of primate species to the previous rules strongly suggests that the cellular scaling rules we have identified apply to primates in general, including humans, and not only to particular subgroups of primate species. In contrast, the allometric rules relating body and brain size are highly sensitive to the particular species sampled, suggesting that brain size is neither determined by body size nor together with it, but is rather only loosely correlated with body size.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Like in mammals, the proportion of nonneuronal cells is very small in the cerebellum, varying between 12% and 19% in songbirds and between 14% and 19% in parrots, but, in contrast to mammals, nonneuronal cells also constitute a minor cellular fraction in the telencephalon, representing 21-40% of cells in songbirds and 31-43% of cells in parrots.
“Like in mammals (32–39, 46), the proportion of nonneuronal cells is very small in the cerebellum, varying between 12% and 19% in songbirds and between 14% and 19% in parrots, but, in contrast to mammals, nonneuronal cells also constitute a minor cellular fraction in the telencephalon, representing 21–40% of cells in songbirds and 31–43% of cells in parrots”
From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [37]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn mammals, the pallium accounts for most of total brain volume, but the cerebellum houses a large majority of brain neurons.
“This markedly contrasts with the situation found in mammals, in which the pallium accounts for most of total brain volume, but the cerebellum houses a large majority of brain neurons (32–39)”
From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [37]
Table 1 (Brain to Body Size; page unavailable) shows that the cerebral cortex makes up most of the measured brain mass in several primates but contains fewer than half their brain neurons. The Relative Distribution of Mass and Cells section (page unavailable) also says cortical and cerebellar shares of brain neurons do not track their shares of brain mass. These passages support the volume–neuron contrast, but the retrieved passages do not establish that the cerebellum contains a large majority of neurons across mammals rather than in the primates studied. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBrain (structure) size scales approximately isometrically as a function of cell number (and therefore computational power) in primates.
“Because brain (structure) size scales approximately isometrically as a function of cell number (and therefore computational power) in primates [24,25]”
From Brain reorganization, not relative brain size, primarily characterizes anthropoid brain evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Gabi, M., Collins, C. E., Wong, P., Torres, L. B., Kaas, J. H., & Herculano-Houzel, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Instituto Evandro Chagas (BR)
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior and Evolution
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-44
- ISSN
- 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9743
- PMC
- PMC2980814
- OpenAlex
- W2023997922
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- National Eye Institute (R01EY002686)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS016446)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- brain scaling, primate brain, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, allometry, phylogenetic correction, rodents, human
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cell Count, Female, Isotopes, Male, Neuroglia, Neurons, Phylogeny, Primates, Species Specificity, Weights and Measures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review