Cited by 149Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of Melissa officinalis Oil and Donepezil for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease

Burns, Alistair, Perry, Elaine, Holmes, Clive, Francis, Paul, Morris, Julie, Howes, Melanie-Jayne R., Chazot, Paul, Lees, George +1 more·2011·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Background/Aims: Behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD) are frequent in people with Alzheimer’s disease and cause considerable stress to patients and their carers. Antipsychotics have been widely used as a first-line treatment, resulting in an estimated 1,800 excess strokes and 1,600 excess deaths in the UK alone. Safe and effective alternatives are urgently needed. Based upon preliminary evidence from clinical trials, aromatherapy with melissa oil may be such an alternative, but initial studies have been modest in size, and adequate blinding has been problematic. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of melissa aromatherapy in the treatment of agitation in people with Alzheimer’s disease in an adequately powered and robustly blinded randomized controlled trial comparing it with donepezil, an anticholinesterase drug used with some benefit to treat BPSD. Methods and Findings: The study was a double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled randomized trial across 3 specialist old age psychiatry centres in England. Participants had probable or possible Alzheimer’s disease, were resident in a care home, had clinically significant agitation (defined as a score of 39 or above on the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory) and were free of antipsychotics and/or anticholinesterase for at least 2 weeks. Participants were allocated to 1 of 3 groups: placebo medication and active aromatherapy; active medication and placebo aromatherapy or placebo of both. Main Outcome: The primary outcome measure was reduction in agitation as assessed by the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS) at 4 weeks. This is an observational scale, and raters were required to wear nose clips to ensure that full blinding was maintained. The PAS, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI; another measure of BPSD) and other outcome measures were completed at baseline, 4-week and 12-week follow-ups. 114 participants were randomized, of whom 94 completed the week 4 assessment and 81 completed the week 12 assessment. Aromatherapy and donepezil were well tolerated. There were no significant differences between aromatherapy, donepezil and placebo at week 4 and week 12, but importantly there were substantial improvements in all 3 groups with an 18% improvement in the PAS and a 37% improvement in the NPI over 12 weeks. Conclusion: When assessed using a rigorous design which ensures blinding of treatment arms, there is no evidence that melissa aromatherapy is superior to placebo or donepezil, in the treatment of agitation in people with Alzheimer’s disease. However, the sizeable improvement in the placebo group emphasizes the potential non-specific benefits of touch and interaction in the treatment of agitation in people with Alzheimer’s disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000324438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 149

Authors
Burns, A., Perry, E., Holmes, C., Francis, P., Morris, J., Howes, M.-J. R., Chazot, P., Lees, G., & Ballard, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
158-164
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2059393353
Cited by
149
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer Society
  • Henry Smith Charity
  • Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew
  • Eisai
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
lemon balm, aromatherapy, donepezil, Alzheimer's disease, agitation, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, cholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic alternatives, nursing home residents, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, treatment efficacy comparison, tolerability
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Indans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Piperidines, Plant Oils, Psychomotor Agitation, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Sample Size, Nootropic Agents, Aromatherapy, Melissa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review