Cited by 15Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryMedical and Pharmaceutic Studies

Use of T4, T4 + T3, and T3 in the Dutch Population in the Period 2005–2011

Open access
de Jong, Niko W., Baljet, G.M.·2012·European Thyroid Journal

Abstract

As chairman of the Dutch Association of Graves' Patients, I was recently invited to speak at a symposium on personalized medicine. The organizers had asked me to present figures on the use of thyroid hormone (especially the combination of T4 and T3) in the Netherlands. With the help of the Royal Netherlands Society of Pharmacy (Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Farmacie), we approached the Foundation Pharmaceutical Indicators (Stichting Farmaceutische Kengetallen). They were able to provide us with key figures on the use of thyroid hormone in the Netherlands over the period 2005–2011 (courtesy of F. Griens). The Foundation collected prescription data from 843 public pharmacies, which had not changed the unique patient identification numbers in the period 2005–2011. The pharmacies linked to the Foundation constitute a representative sample of all pharmacies in the country. The figures obtained from the 843 pharmacies were extrapolated to all Dutch pharmacies, serving the total population of the Netherlands. The number of persons using any thyroid hormone medication increased by 53% in the period 2005–2011; the proportion of the total Dutch population using thyroid hormone increased by 49%, whereas the Dutch population size in the same period increased by 2.1% (table ​(table1).1). Distinguishing between the various thyroid hormone preparations, the number of persons using only T4 increased by 53%, those using the combination of T4 + T3 increased by 67%, and those using T3 only increased by 36%. Among the persons using thyroid hormones, the proportion of only T4 users gradually but consistently decreased from 99.05% in 2005 to 98.98% in 2011. An opposite trend was observed in the T4 + T3 users, which slowly but steadily increased from 0.82% in 2005 to 0.90% in 2011. The proportion of only T3 users did not show a specific trend – it was 0.13% in 2005 and 0.12% in 2011. The assembled data also allowed to analyse whether prescriptions were made by general physicians (GPs) or specialists (table ​(table2).2). With regard to prescriptions for T4 there was a clear trend that in the period 2005–2011, T4 prescriptions by GPs became more frequent (from 79% of all T4 prescriptions in 2005 to 90% in 2011), whereas T4 prescriptions by specialists decreased (from 21 to 10%). The annual proportion of persons starting on T4 fluctuated between 19 and 21% of all thyroid hormone users. Initiation of T4 treatment by GPs increased (from 62% in 2005 to 71.5% in 2011) at the expense of initiation by specialists (from 38% in 2005 down to 28.5% in 2011). With regard to T3 prescriptions, a similar picture emerges. The proportion of T3 prescriptions by GPs rises from 52% in 2005 to 68% in 2011, under a simultaneous fall in T3 prescriptions by specialists from 48 to 32%. The annual proportion of persons starting T3 fluctuated between 0.38 and 0.49% of all thyroid hormone users. Initiation of T3 treatment was done by GPs in 37% in 2005, but had increased to 45.5% in 2011; the figures for specialists declined from 63 to 54.5%. Table 1 Thyroid hormone medication in the Dutch population in the period 2005–2011 Table 2 Prescriptions for T4 and T3 in the Dutch population in the period 2005–2011 in % Two conclusions can be drawn. The number of persons using thyroid hormone medication increased substantially in the period 2005–2011. And the proportion of thyroid hormone medication prescribed by GPs steadily increased in this period, whereas the proportion prescribed by specialists decreased. How can these remarkable trends be explained? We offer a few causal mechanisms. First, the growth of the Dutch population size between 2005 and 2011 will have contributed to the increased number of persons taking thyroid hormone. However, this provides only a partial explanation because the relative increase of thyroid hormone users exceeds by far the relative increase of population size. Second, the composition of the Dutch population is changing with a strong increase of the ageing population. As the incidence of Hashimoto's hypothyroidism increases with advancing age, a greying population will increase the use of thyroid hormones. Nevertheless, this cannot be the whole explanation because the effect of the ageing population is just three times greater than the effect of the general population growth. Third, the Dutch College of General Practitioners (Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap) published in 2006 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid function disorders [1,2]. At the implementation of the guidelines, specific attention was drawn to the condition of subclinical hypothyroidism. It is plausible that the guidelines to a large extent have contributed to the increased use of thyroid hormone, also explaining the shift in prescription behaviour away from the specialists towards the GPs. In further support of this explanation is the introduction of specific software used by labo

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000339449

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liothyronine monotherapy is not commonly recommended for hypothyroid patients, with a rate of 0.12% in The Netherlands in 2011.

    “Liothyronine monotherapy is not commonly recommended for hypothyroid patients (0.12% in The Netherlands in 2011) (165).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 2 · Cited by 15

Authors
de Jong, N. W., & Baljet, G. M.
Affiliations
  • 1
  • Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (NL)
Venue
European Thyroid Journal
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
135-136
ISSN
  • 2235-0640 (ISSN-L)
  • 2235-0802
OpenAlex
W1965447612
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Thyroid Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Medical and Pharmaceutic Studies
Keywords
thyroid hormone replacement, levothyroxine, triiodothyronine, prescribing trends, public pharmacies, Graves' disease, personalized medicine, Dutch population, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review