Alcohol Use and Hazardous Drinking among Medical Specialists
Abstract
Background: Alcohol use among medical specialists remains a delicate topic. However, the number of prevalence studies remains very limited in Western European countries. Aims: To explore alcohol use and hazardous drinking among male and female medical specialists. Methods: All medical specialists in Belgium – a typical Western European country regarding alcohol use – were invited to participate. Alcohol use and abuse were measured using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and the CAGE screen (acronym based on the four items it contains: ‘Cut down drinking’, ‘Annoyed by criticism’, ‘Guilty feelings’ and ‘Eye opener’). Results: A sample of 1,501 specialists completed the survey. The composition of the sample was comparable with that of the overall population of specialists in Belgium regarding gender, age and specialties. A proportion of 18% of the specialists could be classified as hazardous drinkers and 16.8% reported binge drinking at least once a month. Female medical specialists drank less than their male counterparts; however, a substantial proportion of female specialists (14.9%) displayed higher risk levels of hazardous drinking. Significant differences were found between specialties on the CAGE screen. Finally, younger medical specialists tended to display healthier alcohol use patterns compared with their older counterparts. Conclusion: Medical specialists tend to indulge in more hazardous drinking compared with the general population (10%). The alcohol use patterns of female doctors tend to move towards those of males.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Italian legislation identifies the occupational physician as a key figure to prevent alcohol abuse in some work activities, but difficulties in its application remain.
“Italian legislation identifies the occupational physician as a key figure to prevent alcohol abuse in some work activities, but lots of difficulties in its application remain [19, 20].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Joos, L., Glazemakers, I., & Dom, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Venue
- European Addiction Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-97
- ISSN
- 1022-6877 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9891
- OpenAlex
- W2074783994
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Addiction Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- alcohol consumption, hazardous drinking, specialist physicians, physicians, binge drinking, gender differences, age differences, specialty differences, alcohol abuse, Belgium
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Middle Aged, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Binge Drinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review