Physical exercise and clinically depressed patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of aerobic training and strength training as a treatment for depression in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. METHODS: PubMed (Medline), ISI knowledge (Institute for Scientific Information), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library) and Scopus databases were consulted from January 1970 to September 2011. Data were collected on variables as follows: total number of patients (pre- and postintervention), age, randomized (yes or no), diagnostic criteria, assessment instruments, and the percentage of remission and treatment response. Subsequently, we collected information on time intervention, intensity, duration, frequency, method of training (aerobic training and strength training) and type of supervision. Standardized mean differences were used for pooling continuous variables as endpoint scores. Binary outcomes, such as proportion of remission (no symptoms) and at least 50% reduction of initial scores (response), were pooled using relative risks. Random effects models were used that take into account the variance within and between studies. RESULTS: Ten articles were selected and subdivided by their interventions, controlled training modality and levels of intensity. As there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of intervention (strength or aerobic training), we combined data which finally showed a 0.61 (95% CI: -0.88 to -0.33) standard deviation reduction in the intervention group compared to the control group. When the analysis was restricted only to those studies that used the Hamilton scale (n = 15), we observed a reduction of 3.49 points compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, the present meta-analysis concluded that physical exercise improves the response to treatment, especially aerobic training. However, the efficacy of exercise in the treatment of depression was influenced by age and severity of symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physical exercise is an effective non-pharmacological treatment for depression in older adults.
“A meta-analysis reinforced that physical exercise is an effective non-pharmacological treatment for depression in older adults.17”
From Can physical exercise modulate cortisol level in subjects with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Silveira, H., Moraes, H., Oliveira, N., Coutinho, E. S. F., Laks, J., & Deslandes, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
- Venue
- Neuropsychobiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-68
- ISSN
- 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0224
- OpenAlex
- W2081624976
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- physical activity, depression, major depressive disorder, aerobic exercise, resistance training, exercise therapy, remission, treatment response, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, age effects, symptom severity
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Exercise, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review