The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘The Ideal Mesh?'
Open accessAbstract
Currently, more than 200 different textile constructions, so-called ‘meshes', are available for use world-wide in the more than 20 million operations performed annually for the reinforcement of tissues. As any reintervention at the mesh-tissue compound is a surgical challenge, sometimes resulting in almost untreatable defects, huge efforts are being made to improve the biological and functional performance of the meshes. Based on numerous experimental and clinical studies in the past 20 years, our understanding of them has improved markedly. This includes the biomechanical aspects and the histopathological evaluation of the recipient tissue. Sufficiently large pores as well as structural stability in case of mechanical strain have been identified to be crucial to reduce excessive inflammation and fibrosis. Furthermore, large pores prevent bridging of the foreign body reaction through the pore and thereby help to reduce clinical adverse events as erosion, shrinkage or pain. However, with regard to the many different indications for meshes, there will never be one single ideal mesh for all purposes. To achieve an optimal performance, every construction should be designed according to the specific functional requirements, charging the surgeon to identify the best mesh for his purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis
Wynn, T. (2008) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2277 · Cited by 4,495
TGF-β: the master regulator of fibrosis
Meng, X.-M., Nikolic-Paterson, D. J., & Lan, H. Y. (2016) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2016.48 · Cited by 3,528
Cardiac Fibrosis: The Fibroblast Awakens
Travers, J. G., Kamal, F. A., Robbins, J., Yutzey, K. E., & Blaxall, B. C. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.306565 · Cited by 1,596
Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases
Wynn, T. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci31487 · Cited by 1,456
Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Collard, H. R., Moore, B. B., Flaherty, K. R., Brown, K. K., Kaner, R. J., King, T. E., Lasky, J. A., Loyd, J. E., Noth, I., Olman, M. A., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-463pp · Cited by 1,130
Metadata
- Authors
- Klinge, U., Park, J.-K., & Klosterhalfen, B.
- Venue
- Pathobiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 169-175
- ISSN
- 1015-2008 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0291
- OpenAlex
- W2006196877
- Cited by
- 1,783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 123.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘The Ideal Mesh?'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000348446
- The paper
- Klinge, U., Park, J.-K., & Klosterhalfen, B. (2013). ‘The Ideal Mesh?'. Pathobiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000348446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.