A Preliminary Investigation of Depression and Kidney Functioning in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Abstract
Background: The incidence and prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is growing rapidly. Understanding the factors associated with declining renal function is of clinical significance. The current study's main goal was to identify variables that could predict decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time in outpatients with varying stages of CKD. Methods: Seventy CKD patients completed psychological questionnaires and medical variables were extracted from the medical charts. Follow-up GFR was collected 6 months later. CKD patients with elevated depression scores were compared to patients with subclinical depression on medical and psychological variables. Results: Average Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score was 10.0 ± 7.8, placing the mean below the cut-off for clinical elevation. GFR was significantly different for the two groups (nondepressed, 40.0 ± 11.3 vs. depressed 29.6 ± 8.9; p < 0.05). Similarly, patients with elevated depression scores reported lower quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey; p < 0.05) inferior social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List; p < 0.05), and worse community integration (Community Integration Questionnaire; p < 0.05). Utilizing a regression, with a model correcting for baseline GFR, the BDI explained 19% of the variance in GFR score (t = -2.0, p < 0.05) for subjects with decreased GFR. Conclusions: Increased levels of preexisting depression were associated with inferior quality of life, social support and kidney functioning. Depression scores explained a significant amount of variance in GFR scores at 6 months even when corrected for baseline variability. Elevated depression scores are prevalent in CKD populations and further research on the impact of depression interventions is warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Symptoms of depression and anxiety in ESKD are associated with increased morbidity.
“morbidity (Cukor et al . 2013)”
From Improving Distress in Dialysis (iDiD): A tailored CBT self-management treatment for patients undergoing dialysis. (2016) · cites this paper as Cukor et al . 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Cukor, D., Fruchter, Y., Ver Halen, N., Naidoo, S., Patel, A., & Saggi, S. J.
- Affiliations
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
- Yeshiva University (US)
- Venue
- Nephron Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2013-06-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 139-145
- ISSN
- 1660-2110 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971719229
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nephron Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- chronic kidney disease, depression, glomerular filtration rate decline, renal function, quality of life, social support, social reintegration, Beck Depression Inventory, subthreshold depression
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Social Support, Comorbidity, Incidence, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Community Integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review