The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship between Executive Function and Falls and Gait Abnormalities in Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Older adults with dementia have at least a twofold increased risk of falls. Multi-factorial interventions have failed to demonstrate a reduction in falls in this group. Improved understanding of specific cognitive factors and their relationship to gait, balance and falls is required. Methods: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases from inception to April 2011 were conducted to identify prospective studies in older adults examining executive function and its relationship with falls, balance and gait abnormalities. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study populations, executive function measures and study outcomes. Results: Of 8,985 abstracts identified, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Eleven studies examined executive function and falls. The remaining studies examined executive function and gait speed decline. Nine studies examining executive function and falls found a relationship between poor executive function and increased fall risk. All 3 studies examining executive function and gait found an association between poor executive function and declines in gait speed. Impaired executive function was associated with more serious falling patterns. Conclusions: Executive function was associated with falls and gait speed slowing in older adults. Future research should consider executive dysfunction as a training target for fall prevention, or as a factor mediating the failure of conventional fall prevention interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shaw, F. E., Bond, J., Richardson, D. A., Dawson, P., Steen, I. N., McKeith, I. G., & Kenny, R. A. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7380.73 · Cited by 414
Independent predictors of cognitive decline in healthy elderly persons
Marquis, S., Moore, M. M., Howieson, D. B., Sexton, G., Payami, H., Kaye, J. A., & Camicioli, R. (2002) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.59.4.601 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Montero-Odasso, M. M., Kamkar, N., Pieruccini-Faria, F., Osman, A., Sarquis-Adamson, Y., Close, J., Hogan, D. B., Hunter, S. W., Kenny, R. A., Lipsitz, L. A., et al. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38911 · Cited by 334
Self-citationKyrdalen, I. L., Thingstad, P., Sandvik, L., & Ormstad, H. (2019) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.1743 · Cited by 285
Harwood, R. H., Goldberg, S. E., Brand, A., van Der Wardt, V., Booth, V., Di Lorito, C., Hoare, Z., Hancox, J., Bajwa, R., Burgon, C., et al. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-074787 · Cited by 53
Self-citationJehu, D. A., Davis, J. C., Madden, K., Parmar, N., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2022) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000518939 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Kearney, F. C., Harwood, R. H., Gladman, J. R. F., Lincoln, N., & Masud, T.
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 20-35
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- OpenAlex
- W2010337656
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between Executive Function and Falls and Gait Abnormalities in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000350031
- The paper
- Kearney, F. C., Harwood, R. H., Gladman, J. R. F., Lincoln, N., & Masud, T. (2013). The Relationship between Executive Function and Falls and Gait Abnormalities in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1159/000350031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.